Latham Scores $1B Ruling for UBS in Case Over Failed Deal With Hedge Fund Manager
In her ruling, Friedman said the terms of the agreements "unambiguously" entitled UBS to recover losses on its retained assets. She also rejected Highland's counterclaims and attempts to offset the damages.
January 29, 2020 at 06:33 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on New York Law Journal
Latham & Watkins secured a $1 billion judgment Wednesday on behalf of UBS Securities in a long-running contract dispute against bankrupt hedge fund manager Highland Capital Management, which dates back to the early days of the financial crisis.
In a 40-page decision made public late Wednesday afternoon, Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Marcy Friedman ordered two funds affiliated with Dallas-based Highland to pay $520 million in damages and another $520 million in statutory interest resulting from their refusal to cover UBS's losses under a failed agreement to securitize collateralized loan obligations and credit-default swaps in 2008.
UBS claimed in a February 2009 complaint that it was owed $745 million under a series of agreements to purchase and "warehouse" securities for the Highland-controlled funds, with the expectation that it would eventually be able to recoup its initial investment plus interest.
The deal, however, collapsed under the weight of the 2008 financial crisis, and UBS sued in Manhattan Supreme Court to recover its losses, after the Highland funds stopped posting collateral as UBS's exposure grew. The bank filed an updated lawsuit in June 2010, alleging that Highland had fraudulently persuaded the bank to restructure the debt to avoid an $86 million payment.
According to the amended complaint, UBS was owed more than $686 million by the time Highland's affiliates defaulted on their obligations and UBS terminated the deal in December 2008.
Friedman's decision on Wednesday followed a two-week bench trial on the parties' contract claims in July 2018. The judge bifurcated the proceedings, and ordered UBS's remaining claims, including breach of the duty of good faith and fair dealing, fraud and fraudulent conveyance, to be put to be tried later in a second-phase jury trial.
UBS is seeking punitive damages on those claims, potentially exposing Highland to billions more in further liability if the case goes to trial.
In her ruling, Friedman said the terms of the agreements "unambiguously" entitled UBS to recover losses on its retained assets. She also rejected Highland's counterclaims and attempts to offset the damages.
Andrew Clubok, who led the Latham team representing UBS, said his client was "pleased with the result of the trial and looks forward to final resolution of the matter."
A spokeswoman for Highland did not immediately provide comment on the ruling.
Highland filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in October amid legal disputes with its investors. Known as a pioneer in trading risky corporate loans, the firm and its founder, James Dondero, managed tens of billions of dollars in assets during its heyday in 2007 but sustained losses during the financial crisis and has been entangled in lawsuits ever since.
Media outlets reported earlier this month that Highland and a committee of unsecured creditors, including UBS, had agreed to a deal for Dondero to relinquish his role as president, though he plans to stay on as an employee of the firm.
Latham's trial team was led by Clubok, who chairs Latham's global securities litigation and professional liability practice, and Elizabeth Deeley, a partner in the firm's San Francisco office. The team also included Washington, D.C.-based counsel Susan Engel, New York partner Kuan Huang and New York associate Alysha Naik, as well as Michael Onufer, a litigation partner with Kirkland & Ellis.
Highland and its funds are represented by Angela J. Somers, Jeffrey E. Gross and Yonah Jaffe of Reid Collins & Tsai.
Read More:
Banks Agree to $337M Settlement in Price-Fixing Case
Highland Capital Takes Financial News Site to Court Over Comment
Litigation Department of the Year, Professional Liability: Latham & Watkins
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMoFo Associate Sees a Familiar Face During Her First Appellate Argument: Justice Breyer
Amid the Tragedy of the L.A. Fires, a Lesson on the Value of Good Neighbors
Litigators of the Week: Shortly After Name Partner Kathleen Sullivan’s Retirement, Quinn Emanuel Scores Appellate Win for Vimeo
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250