U.S. Judge in Boston Hands Novo Nordisk Loss in Noncompete Feud With Rival
Novo Nordisk, represented by lawyers from Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, is locked in a dispute with BioMarin Pharmaceutical, represented by Jones Day, in courts in Massachusetts, Texas, New York and California. A Boston judge on Wednesday declined to issue a temporary restraining order.
February 05, 2020 at 03:22 PM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
Updated at 5:11 p.m.
A Boston federal trial judge on Wednesday refused to immediately stop a former Novo Nordisk Inc. employee from working at a rival company, a defeat for the pharmaceutical giant as it fights in courts across the country to enforce noncompete agreements amid a series of departures.
Novo Nordisk, represented by lawyers from Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, is locked in a dispute with California-based rival BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. in courts in Massachusetts, Texas, New York and California. Last month, a Texas judge declined to issue a temporary restraining order against a former Novo Nordisk employee.
Morgan Lewis attorneys have accused BioMarin of leading a campaign to "systematically raid Novo Nordisk's hemophilia sales force to launch BioMarin's directly-competitive hemophilia therapies." Former Novo Nordisk employees in some cases are the plaintiffs, contesting the validity of workplace agreements that restrict jumping to competing companies.
"It is not clear that Novo and BioMarin are competitors given the different types of treatment each offers to hemophilia patients and the fact that use of the therapies is not mutually exclusive," U.S. District Judge Allison Burroughs of the District of Massachusetts said in her order Wednesday denying both a temporary restraining order and a preliminary injunction.
Burroughs also noted that former Novo Nordisk sales official Thomas Russomano's employment "was consistently unstable as his position was eliminated in both 2016 and 2018, and his territory shifted repeatedly." The judge determined the noncompete provisions of a 2016 agreement were no longer in effect.
Siobhan Mee and Sarah Butson of Morgan Lewis represent Novo Nordisk in the Massachusetts case. Mee, who leads the firm's labor and employment team in the Boston office, was not immediately reached for comment.
Jones Day represents the former employee, Russomano, a sales official who left Novo Nordisk in January. Jones Day partner Christopher Morrison, arguing for Russomano, said his client did not have a noncompete obligation to Novo Nordisk.
"Novo has no legitimate interests to protect in this case. As a life-long hemophilia patient, [Russomano] carried knowledge about the hemophilia patient community with him to Novo and he is entitled to carry it out," Morrison told the court.
Russomano, the Morgan Lewis lawyers argued recently, "will necessarily and inevitably use and disclose his confidential Information about Novo Nordisk's hemophilia business, and leverage the customer and stakeholder relationships he developed at Novo Nordisk on behalf of BioMarin, thereby wrongfully damaging Novo Nordisk's competitive advantage and customer goodwill."
A representative from Novo Nordisk were not immediately reached for comment Wednesday afternoon.
BioMarin said in a statement:
"We appreciate the court's thoughtful review and recognizing that the non-compete is not enforceable against our employee. BioMarin is committed to competing fairly in the market, defending our employees, and working with them to deliver breakthrough therapies to the international Hemophilia community. We will continue to challenge any future inappropriate use of non-compete agreements to stifle innovation and inhibit the development and commercialization of important advancements like gene therapy."
In September, Novo Nordisk sued a former employee and BioMarin in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of New York. BioMarin's time to respond to the complaint was put on hold in mid-January. Novo Nordisk has a deadline of Feb. 14 to file an amended complaint or otherwise update the court on the company's plans.
"Ongoing discussions between plaintiff Novo Nordisk and defendant BioMarin aimed at resolving this matter have reached an apparent impasse, and continuation of the litigation appears necessary," the lawyers for the two sides told the court Jan. 16.
On Jan. 24, a Texas federal district judge denied Novo Nordisk's request for a temporary restraining order. In that case, a former employee named Julie Golla sued Novo Nordisk. Houston-based Jones Day partner Joanne Bush represents BioMarin and Golla.
"Novo has not set forth any evidence that it will be harmed," Bush said in a court filing last month. "Golla diligently returned all her company materials and Novo has only made vague statements about the information it claims is at risk."
The presiding trial judge, Senior U.S. District Judge David Hittner of the Southern District of Texas, deferred ruling on Novo Nordisk's request for a preliminary injunction until after a hearing. The lawyers in the case have proposed a March 4 hearing.
|This report was updated with comment from BioMarin.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLitigators of the Week: After a 74-Day Trial, Shook Fends Off Claims From Artist’s Heirs Against UMB Bank
An ‘Indiana Jones Moment’: Mayer Brown’s John Nadolenco and Kelly Kramer on the 10-Year Legal Saga of the Bahia Emerald
‘It's Your Funeral’: Avoiding Doing Damage to Your Client’s Case With Uncivil Behavior
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250