MDL Panel Sends Zantac Lawsuits to Southern District of Florida
On Thursday, the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation chose the Southern District of Florida for "what could be a large litigation" over the heartburn medication. The panel selected U.S. District Judge Robin Rosenberg, who has not handled an MDL before.
February 06, 2020 at 02:48 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Daily Business Review
A federal judicial panel sent more than 140 lawsuits filed over heartburn medication Zantac to the Southern District of Florida, where U.S. District Judge Robin Rosenberg will preside over them.
In a Thursday order, the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation cited the convenience and resources of the Southern District of Florida, adding that Rosenberg, a 2014 appointee of President Obama, has not handled an MDL before.
"A large number of Zantac actions are pending in the Southern District of Florida, which is supported by the majority of responding plaintiffs," wrote MDL Panel Chairwoman Karen Caldwell. "The district is a relatively convenient and accessible forum, with the resources and the capacity to efficiently handle what could be a large litigation."
The lawsuits, both individual cases alleging personal injuries and class actions brought for economic damages, allege that the companies that made and sold Zantac knew its active ingredient, ranitidine, metabolized in the human body to form a carcinogen known as N-nitrosodimethylamine, or NDMA.
Sanofi-Aventis U.S., which recalled over-the-counter Zantac on Oct. 18 after the U.S. Food and Drug Administration found unacceptable levels of NDMA in ranitidine samples, is one of several defendants named in the cases, which have brought in top defense attorneys. The others are GlaxoSmithKline, which first received FDA approval to sell the drug and recalled prescription Zantac on Oct. 8, and Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Pfizer Inc., which both sold Zantac.
Plaintiffs attorneys have predicted large numbers of cases over Zantac, which has been on the market since 1983.
They initially sought an MDL in several venues in addition to Florida, such as New Jersey, California and New York. "At oral argument, however, most plaintiffs appeared to have coalesced around the Southern District of Florida as their first choice for transferee district," the panel wrote in its order.
In an email, plaintiffs attorney Steve Berman of Seattle's Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro, who initially sought a Zantac MDL in New Jersey, said Florida had "more judicial resources," while judges in New Jersey were "slammed due to judicial shortages."
The defendants supported the District of New Jersey, where Sanofi has its U.S. headquarters, or the Southern District of New York, home to Pfizer. GlaxoSmithKline's U.S. unit is based in Philadelphia, and Boehringer Ingelheim has a U.S. unit in Connecticut.
The lawsuits follow the FDA's investigation of NDMA in some blood pressure and heart failure medicines. Last year, the FDA found a carcinogen in those medications, such as generic valsartan, prompting the filing of more than 140 lawsuits now coordinated in multidistrict litigation in New Jersey. Lawyers suing over Zantac sought to distinguish the valsartan cases, which focus on an alleged manufacturing defect.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLitigators of the Week: After a 74-Day Trial, Shook Fends Off Claims From Artist’s Heirs Against UMB Bank
An ‘Indiana Jones Moment’: Mayer Brown’s John Nadolenco and Kelly Kramer on the 10-Year Legal Saga of the Bahia Emerald
‘It's Your Funeral’: Avoiding Doing Damage to Your Client’s Case With Uncivil Behavior
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250