Litigation Funder Agrees to Arbitrate Claims Against Tom Girardi
Arizona lender Stillwell Madison, represented by counsel at DLA Piper, has agreed to stay its fraud claims against Girardi, his law firm and his wife while it arbitrates contract claims related to a $3,454,804 loan forbearance agreement.
February 07, 2020 at 02:39 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Recorder
"" width="620" height="372" /> Tom Girardi and his wife Erika Jayne during the episode "Horsing Around" of the Bravo television show "The Real Housewives of Beverly Hills," which aired Dec. 15, 2015. Credit: Bravo
An Arizona-based litigation funder that sued Tom Girardi last year claiming that he used loan funds designated for his law firm to fund a "lavish lifestyle" has agreed to pursue its claims in arbitration.
Lawyers at DLA Piper filed court papers Thursday indicating that their client, Stillwell Madison, had agreed to stay fraud claims against the prominent plaintiffs lawyer, his firm and his wife, while the lender pursues its contract claims concerning a $3,454,804 loan forbearance agreement through expedited arbitration proceedings with JAMS.
Stillwell Madison filed suit in Arizona federal court last year claiming that Girardi failed to disclose that he and the firm had defaulted on a loan from a separate lender at the time of the forbearance. Girardi's lawyers asked to dismiss the case, calling it a "publicity stunt" aimed at capitalizing on media attention surrounding his wife Erika Jayne's role on the reality television show "The Real Housewives of Beverly Hills." They also claimed the dispute was subject to arbitration.
U.S. District Judge Steven Logan of the District of Arizona last month denied Girardi's motion to compel arbitration or dismiss the suit last month on technical grounds. Logan found that Girardi's initial lawyers on the motion to dismiss—Phillip A. Baker and Robert C. Baker at the Los Angeles law firm Baker, Keener & Nahra—hadn't applied for pro hac vice status at the time they filed the motion. The judge also found that Phoenix lawyer Patrick McGroder III of Beus Gilbert McGroder, who had also made filings on Girardi's behalf, wasn't authorized to appear in the case.
Since Logan's ruling, Girardi's lawyers have filed a second motion to compel arbitration in the case, something that the lender's lawyers at DLA Piper claim was done without conferring with them. Still, the lender's lawyers, who indicated that their client has already had one unsuccessful mediation session with the Girardi defendants, noted that it makes sense to move forward with the case in arbitration rather than federal court.
"Setting aside defendants' cavalier attention to this court's rules, and even though Stillwell maintains the substantive arguments raised in opposition to the first motion to compel are equally valid and support denial of the second motion to compel, for reasons related to economy of party and judicial resources, Stillwell consents to arbitrate the claims asserted herein," wrote the lender's DLA lawyers.
DLA Piper's Laura Sixkiller and Kate Benveniste didn't respond to messages seeking comment Friday. Although prior filings from the lender had referred to Girardi's wife by name, Thursday's filing referred to her as "Jane Doe Girardi" in the case caption.
Girardi didn't immediately respond to a request for comment Friday.
Read more:
Arizona Court Tosses Girardi's Early Bid to Dismiss Litigation Funder's Suit
Tom Girardi and Other Prominent Trial Lawyers Help Drive Biden Fundraising
Arizona Lender Says Loan Dispute With Girardi Should Remain in Court
'Publicity Stunt': Girardi Calls Out Arizona Lender Who Targeted His Wife and Lifestyle in Lawsuit
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
MoFo Associate Sees a Familiar Face During Her First Appellate Argument: Justice Breyer
Amid the Tragedy of the L.A. Fires, a Lesson on the Value of Good Neighbors
Litigators of the Week: Shortly After Name Partner Kathleen Sullivan’s Retirement, Quinn Emanuel Scores Appellate Win for Vimeo
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
