Wiley Rein offices in Washington, D.C. Credit: Diego M. Radzinschi / NLJWiley Hits Back at Client That Claimed It Got Used as a 'Milk Cow for Legal Fees'
The firm's former software client racked up nearly $1 million in fees pursuing a failed lawsuit. Wiley says it's still owed $220K.
February 07, 2020 at 05:43 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
Wiley Rein is fighting back against claims that it overbilled a Bethesda-based software developer in a legal battle the developer lost, accusing its former client of stiffing it on the bill.
The Washington, D.C.-based law firm has filed a counterclaim against AirFacts, an airfare auditing software developer, alleging it hasn't paid at least $221,857.08 in legal fees that the developer racked up in a lawsuit against a former employee.
Wiley Rein has until Thursday to file its motion to strike AirFacts' answer to its Dec. 20 counterclaim. The law firm contends that AirFacts' answer violated a local court rule that spells out how pleadings are structured. However, both Wiley Rein and AirFacts' lawyer have indicated that motion filing might not come.
"They seek a more detailed answer. Should resolve itself," said Nicholas Hantzes, a McLean-based lawyer representing AirFacts.
Wiley Rein billed AirFacts $970,997.67 over the course of a nearly two-year legal battle against Diego de Amezaga, a former employee who allegedly broke a nonsolicitation covenant when he took a job with American Airlines, an AirFacts customer.
In a Nov. 1 lawsuit filed in D.C. Superior Court, AirFacts accused Wiley Rein of turning "this straight-forward litigation into a milk cow for legal fees, racking up just under $1,000,000 through the end of the five-day bench trial." AirFacts and Wiley Rein sued de Amezaga in May 2015 in Maryland federal court; they lost at trial in February 2017.
But the firm shot back, saying AirFacts executives knew they were pursuing a costly lawsuit whose underlying arguments weren't "straight forward," and shot down any notion of settling with de Amezaga.
Wiley Rein says AirFacts dutifully paid its legal bills until September 2017, when AirFacts retained other counsel to pursue an appeal.
"In the end, [AirFacts CEO April] Pearson's strategy was to aggressively pursue the litigation so that she could send a clear message to her employees and her clients that she enforced her employee agreements," Wiley Rein said in its counterclaim. "It was, as she stated, a matter of principle for her. Despite all of the challenging aspects of the case explicitly pointed out to her by her Wiley Rein lawyers, she chose to proceed and wanted to have her day in court."
Twenty Wiley Rein lawyers and staffers worked on AirFacts' case, which was led by Todd Bromberg, an employment and labor partner in the firm's D.C. office.
According to court records, Wiley Rein lawyers billed AirFacts more than $775,000 in fees for over 1,600 hours of work. Bromberg himself billed the software developer $392,343.10 for 585.2 hours of work. An associate, Moshe Broder, clocked in the most hours at 755.9, which came to $282,949.04 in attorney fees.
Wiley Rein is the sole defendant and counterplaintiff in the lawsuit. It's being represented by a team of attorneys from Kramon & Graham in Baltimore. Wiley Rein did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Litigators of the Week: A Trade Secret Win at the ITC for Viking Over Promising Potential Liver Drug
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
