Wilmer Battling $13M Lawsuit Over Contract That Led to 'Litigation Bonanza'
The law firm prepared a stock purchasing agreement between two former business partners, who now disagree over the financial terms, prompting a legal battle one federal judge described as akin to "The War of the Roses."
February 11, 2020 at 02:24 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr is fighting back against a $13 million lawsuit alleging it was negligent in preparing the stock purchasing agreement between two former, embittered business partners.
The stock purchasing agreement between John DeBlasio and Thomas Charron led to a lawsuit one federal judge described as a "litigation bonanza rivaling Warren Adler's 'The War of the Roses.'" DeBlasio later sued Wilmer in April 2019, saying the firm's negligence cost him at least $13 million in damages. Discovery is set to end in the case March 1.
DeBlasio and Charron were U.S. Military Academy at West Point graduates who became military contractors, creating a company known as Sallyport Global Holdings. Over time, their personal and professional relationships deteriorated, to the point where they had to retain outside consultants to communicate.
DeBlasio offered to buy out Charron's 50% shares in Sallyport, and Wilmer was retained in February 2010 to craft that agreement. The stock purchase agreement contained a "windfall provision" that would give Charron 20% of the proceeds if DeBlasio sold Sallyport within a year.
However, DeBlasio contended Charron wasn't entitled to that cut unless Sallyport was sold for at least $65 million. That language was drafted, but, as U.S. District Judge William Pauley of the Southern District of New York noted, it was never included in the final agreement.
"Wilmer further breached the duty of care it owed to plaintiffs by negligently failing to inform and/or warn Mr. DeBlasio that the terms of the windfall protection clause would not operate as they had represented to him," DeBlasio said in his lawsuit.
Charron sued DeBlasio in September 2012 in the Southern District of New York after learning his former business partner sold Sallyport to DC Partners, a private equity firm, for $64.5 million. Pauley ruled in favor of Charron in December 2014, finding that the windfall provision gave him a 20% cut of the sale, regardless of the amount.
Pauley awarded Charron $15.7 million, which is 20% of $78 million, the real amount Sallyport sold for, the judge determined.
"This lawsuit is a sad denouncement to what began as a vibrant and symbiotic partnership between two West Point graduates," Pauley said, before adding that this "business divorce should have never spilled into a federal courtroom."
Pauley referenced Adler's "The War of the Roses." Although ostensibly named for the 37 years of civil war England experienced as warring noble houses competed for the throne, Adler's book is about a married couple that falls out of love.
DeBlasio's lawsuit, filed in D.C. Superior Court, levels charges of professional negligence, breach of fiduciary duty of undivided loyalty and negligent misrepresentation against Wilmer.
Wilmer is represented by lawyers from Carr Maloney in Washington and Goulston & Storrs in Boston. Richard Zielinski, a director at Goulston & Storrs, declined to comment.
DeBlasio is represented by Tom Watson and Curtis Renner of Watson & Renner; they did not respond to requests of comment as of press time.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow the Court of Public Opinion Should Factor Into Litigation Strategy
An Eye on ‘De-Risking’: Chewing on Hot Topics in Litigation Funding With Jeffery Lula of GLS Capital
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Transgender Care Fight Targets More Adults as Georgia, Other States Weigh Laws
- 2Roundup Special Master's Report Recommends Lead Counsel Get $0 in Common Benefit Fees
- 3Georgia Justices Urged to Revive Malpractice Suit Against Retired Barnes & Thornburg Atty
- 4How Gibson Dunn Lawyers Helped Assemble the LA FireAid Benefit Concert in 'Extreme' Time Crunch
- 5Lawyer Wears Funny Ears When Criticizing: Still Sued for Defamation
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250