Jury Finds Harvey Weinstein Guilty of 3rd-Degree Rape and Criminal Sexual Act
Six women testified against Weinstein at his trial, describing three decades of interactions with Weinstein. Annabella Sciorra, Miriam Haley and Jessica Mann all testified about incidents that led to his criminal charges, while the other three women were allowed to testify as "prior bad acts" witnesses.
February 24, 2020 at 11:44 AM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on New York Law Journal
A Manhattan jury Monday morning convicted former Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein on criminal sexual act and third-degree rape charges, but split its verdict by acquitting him on the most serious charges in the case, predatory sexual assault and first-degree rape.
District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr. and lawyers representing Weinstein's accusers immediately hailed the verdict, while Weinstein's lawyers said they have a strong case for appeal.
"It is a new era. The #MeToo movement has educated us all," said Deborah Katz of Katz, Marshall & Banks, who represents accuser Dawn Dunning.
Weinstein was jailed Monday in anticipation of his sentencing, set for March 11. He also faces criminal charges, including forcible rape, in Los Angeles.
His lawyer, Arthur Aidala of Aidala, Bertuna & Kamins, said the defense team will ask for Weinstein's release on bail pending appeal this week. Appellate lawyers who reviewed the case file over the weekend raised a number of issues for appeal, Aidala said, including the complicated verdict sheet and the testimony of "prior bad acts," or Molineux, witnesses.
During the monthlong trial, three Molineux witnesses were allowed to testify about incidents that did not lead to an indictment for Weinstein in New York, testimony that legal experts believe could have shifted the verdict in the case.
Weinstein, 67, has maintained his innocence amid all the allegations against him, which reportedly involve more than 100 women at this point. Many told their stories publicly after The New York Times and the New Yorker magazine published a pair of major investigations into his behavior toward women in October 2017.
When the verdict was read in court Monday, Weinstein was "stoic," Aidala said.
"All he kept saying was 'I'm innocent. But I'm innocent,'" Aidala said.
The jury found Weinstein guilty of criminal sexual act in the first degree, which carries a sentence of five to 25 years in prison, against Miriam Haley. Haley testified that Weinstein performed forcible oral sex on her in his New York apartment in 2006. He was also found guilty of third-degree rape against Jessica Mann, which could lead to a short prison sentence or probation.
Vance said he is not disappointed in the verdict, even though Weinstein was acquitted of the top charge, predatory sexual assault, which carried a maximum sentence of life in prison. He said the case "turned the page" of public understanding on how sexual assault works.
"Rape is rape … whether it's committed by an indigent person or a man of immense power, prestige, and privilege," Vance said. "Rape is rape whether the survivor reports it within the next hour, within a year, or never at all. It's rape, despite the complicated dynamics of power and consent after an assault. It's rape even if there is no physical evidence. Even if it happened a long time ago."
Weinstein's defense attorneys, notably the Chicago attorney Donna Rotunno, conducted tough cross-examination during the trial, asking the women why they didn't run away sooner or fight back more violently. Asked about the anxiety women often face in coming forward, Vance said he hopes the verdict shows that that kind of cross-examination is not effective.
"I hope that with this verdict it will become more obvious that those kinds of attacks on survivors and victims who are on the stand, making it seem like it's all their fault, will be realized as legal attacks that just simply are no longer going to work in this day and age," he said.
Six women testified against Weinstein at his trial, describing three decades of interactions with Weinstein. Prosecutors described Weinstein as a calculating predator who targeted vulnerable women and took advantage of his status in the entertainment industry to keep them quiet.
Weinstein's defense team also spoke often about Weinstein's professional power, but argued that the women agreed to sexual relationships with Weinstein to build their own careers and enjoy his power and wealth.
"Every single one of these women reaches out, asks for things, and he does everything he can do to make it happen," Rotunno said during her closing argument. "This is not a monster."
In Los Angeles, Weinstein is charged with forcible rape, forcible oral copulation, sexual penetration by use of force and sexual battery by restraint, prosecutors in California announced on the day his trial began in New York.
Weinstein is likely to stay in a jail infirmary because of ongoing issues with his health, his lawyers said. In addition to back problems that led him to use a walker throughout the trial, Weinstein is under the care of five doctors and is receiving injections "in his eyes" to prevent blindness, Rotunno said just after the verdict was read.
READ MORE:
Judge in Harvey Weinstein Trial Issues Gag Order in Wake of Defense Lawyer's Op-Ed
7 Men, 5 Women Will Sit as Jury in Harvey Weinstein's New York Rape Trial
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMoFo Associate Sees a Familiar Face During Her First Appellate Argument: Justice Breyer
Amid the Tragedy of the L.A. Fires, a Lesson on the Value of Good Neighbors
Litigators of the Week: Shortly After Name Partner Kathleen Sullivan’s Retirement, Quinn Emanuel Scores Appellate Win for Vimeo
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250