Stuck on a Ship, These Florida Residents Are Suing Over Coronavirus Quarantine
Two Florida passengers are stuck on a cruise ship. But their lawyer has filed suit on land.
March 09, 2020 at 02:38 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Daily Business Review
Debi Chalik, a personal injury attorney at the Chalik & Chalik Law Offices in Plantation, filed a federal lawsuit on behalf of Broward County clients Monday.
Her clients Eva and Ronald Weissberger, who are her parents, sued Princess Cruise Lines Ltd. for gross negligence in connection with a coronavirus outbreak aboard the Grand Princess cruise ship on which they are traveling.
The lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, seeks more than $1 million in damages. It blames Princess Cruise Lines for allowing passengers aboard the ship, despite allegedly knowing the vessel was contaminated with coronavirus.
Princess Cruise Lines did not respond to requests for comment by deadline.
Meanwhile, Chalik said Eva, 69, and Ronald, 75, have been stranded on the cruise ship since Thursday, in bleak conditions. She said the couple is "exposed to the Coronavirus running rampant" on the cruise ship where they are "paying passengers."
|
Read more: Instant Insights / As Coronavirus Spreads, Legal Industry Shifts into Crisis Management Mode
The ship is off the coast of San Francisco where passengers are "awaiting their fate," according to the attorney. Prior to arriving aboard the vessel, several hundred passengers were aboard the Diamond Princess.
Before boarding the ship, proper screening protocols were not in place to minimize exposure to the disease to passengers and crew, the lawsuit alleges. Before boarding the Grand Princess, passengers only had to fill out a single piece of paper to confirm they were not sick with the new virus and no passengers were questioned.
Passengers on the previous cruise ship were notified on Feb. 25 that at least two passengers had symptoms of COVID-19. Sixty-two passengers on the earlier voyage were exposed to the passengers that were confirmed infected, and two later died.
However, the new passengers on the Grand Princess were not notified prior to the sailing that other passengers had been on a cruise ship with infected passengers. Had they been notified, plaintiffs allege, they could have avoided going aboard the Grand Princess or disembarked in Hawaii soon after the cruise ship set sail. Two of those new passengers, Eva and Ronald, are the parents of the attorney who filed the lawsuit.
"The biggest problem is there is no communication from the ship with passengers," Chalik said. "They really learned the information from people like me, on land."
"They are in the dark," she added. "They are given snippets of information."
Chalik, in an interview with the Daily Business Review, said she is fielding calls from other people aboard the ship. Chalik said there is a real sense of panic on the vessel from passengers and crew members. She told us two other people aboard are in the process of filing a lawsuit.
Right now, servers are delivering three meals a day to passengers. Ronald, who has heart issues, was told by staff that he would have his medication before it runs out on Wednesday, but has no assurance it will arrive on time.
Once the cruise ship disembarks, passengers from California will remain in quarantine. Passengers from other states could be sent to military bases, likely in Texas or Georgia.
Chalik said, "I can't even imagine being in my parents' shoes right now."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLitigators of the Week: An Early Knockout Win in the Decongestant MDL
A Case Study in How Susman Gets Associates Experience in BIG Trials
Talking Shop About Faegre Drinker's New Arizona Design Lab with Trial Partner David 'DJ' Gross
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 3Mass. Judge Declares Mistrial in Talc Trial: 'Court Can't Accommodate This Case'
- 4It's Time Law Firms Were Upfront About Who Their Salaried Partners Are
- 5Greenberg Traurig Initiates String of Suits Following JPMorgan Chase's 'Infinite Money Glitch'
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250