Daily Dicta: Big Law Litigators See COVID-19 as a 'Recipe for Litigation'
One big question will be whether companies' actions were reasonable. "But what does 'reasonable' look like today?" asked Gwyn Williams, a complex commercial litigation partner at Latham & Watkins.
March 17, 2020 at 11:05 PM
5 minute read
Litigation is coming—lots of litigation.
That's the consensus from Big Law litigators I spoke with yesterday about the coronavirus pandemic.
"I see [COVID-19-related] litigation arising in just about every possible practice area you could think of," said Gwyn Williams, a complex commercial litigation partner at Latham & Watkins.
"In some respects, this is a brave new world, so who the heck knows? But I think it will come in waves," she said, starting with emergency actions to stop foreclosures, for example, but spreading steadily into disputes involving insurance coverage, contractual obligations, mass torts, consumer class actions, bankruptcy, M&A, securities fraud and more.
Ropes & Gray litigation head Gregg Weiner agreed. "Anytime there's an unpredicted and unanticipated event, that's sort of a recipe for litigation," he said.
Pointing to 9/11 and the financial crisis of 2007-2008, he noted that there "are elements of both here, but it's not like either one exactly."
Some of the issues are similar—business interruptions and major market distress, for example—but the pandemic is "unique. It's health-related, it's more global."
It also lacks obvious bad guys, like terrorists or greedy bankers. "This is kind of a villain-less scenario," Weiner said.
He's hopeful that perhaps a shared sense among the parties that "we're both victims here" might make it easier to resolve some disputes more amicably.
Or not.
"We are going to be very busy," said McKool Smith principal Gayle Klein, who notes that her firm has a robust practice litigating against insurance companies and banks. "There will be a wealth of litigation between lenders and companies."
She predicted some disputes will revolve around whether corporations are in line with their debt covenants, as well as conflicts over lease payments.
"The business cycle is a cycle, and we've been at the top for longer than normal. Now we're seeing a major correction in the market," Klein said, predicting "a lot of bankruptcies and a lot of deals that will have gone wrong."
Weiner also flagged M&A-related litigation. "So many deals were being signed … and then all the world changed," he said.
One key question: Will an acquiring party be able to invoke a material adverse event to get out of a pending purchase?
The answer is still unclear and of course will depend on how exactly the clause is written. But generally, a material adverse event would typically need to last long enough to have a "significant impact," he said, and at this moment, no one knows how long the COVID-19 outbreak will last. "What if in four weeks we're getting back to work? Or will it be getting worse, with no end in sight?"
Still, Weiner said he thinks we'll see "some buyers start to invoke these clauses, or to consider enforcement of the clauses."
At Munger, Tolles & Olson, commercial litigation partner Robert Dell Angelo said he's been fielding calls from clients seeking advice on whether or not to close, as well as contract-related questions.
"They need real-time advice. We don't have the luxury of gathering all the facts," he said. "We need to provide usable, practical advice as opposed to perfect advice that comes too late."
Further down the road, he predicted a spike in securities litigation related to stock drops. "But I think there's a strong defense for companies" that they can't have been expected to predict the future of the virus. "I'd rather be on the defense side," he added.
Latham's Williams agreed that clients are asking "What do I need to do right now?" she said. "There are a lot of questions about contracts—what if can't perform? Can I cancel?"
She also anticipates a jump in consumer class actions. For example, what if consumers are being automatically billed each month for a gym that suddenly closed?
"Other tort liability may involve commercial landlords, hotels, airlines," she said. All serve a large number of customers, and could be held liable if they failed to shut down when they should have.
The big question will be whether their actions were reasonable. "But what does 'reasonable' look like today?" she said.
Beyond strictly legal advice, Williams is offering her clients other wisdom as well. "One thing I've said is to think about being kind. [Clients] need to understand their legal obligations, but maybe in this moment in time, do you want to be more generous than you're necessarily legally required to be?" she said. "Is this the right thing for you and your company to do?"
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhy Litigation Demand Might Break Firms’ Boom-and-Bust Cycle
Litigation Leaders: Laura Hoey of Ropes & Gray on Bringing an Industry Focus to Litigation Matters
Talking Shop About Faegre Drinker's New Arizona Design Lab with Trial Partner David 'DJ' Gross
How Do You Get Experience Leading an MDL Without Experience Leading an MDL?
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-58
- 2Sweet James Clinches $17.4M Personal Injury Jury Verdict in California's Kings County
- 3In Lame-Duck Session, US Senate Confirms Illinois Federal Judge on Bipartisan Vote
- 4Gordon Rees Opens 80th Office, ‘Collaboration Hub’ in Palo Alto
- 5The White Stripes Drop Copyright Claim Against Trump Campaign
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250