US Judge Rules Past iCloud Subscribers Can't Pursue Injunctive Relief in Class Action
In partially granting Apple's motion to dismiss a class action of iCloud users who argue that the tech company fraudulently outsourced the storage of their data to Microsoft and Google, U.S. District Judge Lucy Koh ruled that class members who did not pay Apple for storage do not currently have standing for injunctive relief.
March 30, 2020 at 08:46 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Recorder
A federal judge has partially granted Apple Inc.'s motion to dismiss a putative class action over claims that it breached its contract with iCloud Users when it enlisted other tech giants to store user data, further outlining what qualifies as an injury worthy of standing in cases involving consumer data.
The class members allege that Apple deceived them into overpaying for the iCloud subscription since their content was stored by the likes of Amazon, Microsoft and Google, some of which offer cheaper storage and cloud computing services, and not by Apple, as the agreement suggested, according to the August complaint.
U.S. District Judge Lucy Koh of the Northern District of California agreed with the company's Cooley attorneys that class members must currently pay for an iCloud subscription to qualify for injunctive relief. The jurist, who Wired once dubbed the "Meme-Worthy Judge of Silicon Valley's Titans" as her rulings in the Yahoo and Adobe data breach cases blazed fresh trails in data protection law, invoked two of her prior decisions in the March 27 order.
Koh ruled that the "real and immediate threat of repeated injury" necessary to gain standing for Article III injunctive relief does not apply to class members who do not currently pay for the service, and she said plaintiffs do not allege that they currently pay for iCloud or plan to in the future.
"Simply pleading that Plaintiffs are storing their data on Apple's iCloud is not enough to plead an injury in fact because Plaintiffs' injury is not merely connected to storing data on the iCloud but to overpaying for the paid version of iCloud storage," Koh wrote. "Without alleging that Plaintiffs are currently paid iCloud subscribers—as opposed to merely utilizing the free five GB of iCloud storage—Plaintiffs have not met their burden of establishing an injury that is 'certainly impending.'"
The judge granted Apple's motion to dismiss injunctive relief claims and alleged violations of California's False Advertising (FAL) and Unfair Competition Laws (UCL) but offered plaintiffs leave to amend.
Koh cited In re iPhone Application Litigation, which she presided over, in batting away class members' claims that they relied on the contractual language in their decision to purchase a subscription, a necessary prong in FAL and UCL violations.
"Plaintiffs assert that they adequately plead reliance because they 'affirmatively clicked the "AGREE" [button] signifying their review and assent to the contract terms,' including Apple's alleged misrepresentations regarding iCloud storage. This Court, however, has previously rejected this precise argument," she wrote.
However, the judge did find that the class sufficiently made a case for monetary damages under Article III with their claims that "Apple's 'price premium' harmed putative class members who would have otherwise utilized these cheaper cloud storage alternatives."
Plaintiffs, who are represented by The Katriel Law Firm and The Mehdi Firm, allege that Apple breached its terms of service by handing off its digital files to third-parties to store in their facilities. Koh said that in the Yahoo data breach litigation, "this court has previously recognized that such allegations are sufficient to confer standing."
Apple and Cooley's Beatriz Mejia, Matthew Brown and Lauren Pomeroy in San Francisco did not respond to a request for comment at the time of publication. Roy Katriel of The Katriel Law Firm Del Mar, California, and Azra Mehdi of The Mehdi Firm in San Francisco also did not respond to a request for comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWith DEI Rollbacks, Employment Lawyers See Potential For Targeting Corporate Commitment to Equality
7 minute readMoFo Associate Sees a Familiar Face During Her First Appellate Argument: Justice Breyer
Amid the Tragedy of the L.A. Fires, a Lesson on the Value of Good Neighbors
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1The Rise and Risks of Merchant Cash Advance Debt Relief Companies
- 2Ill. Class Action Claims Cannabis Companies Sell Products with Excessive THC Content
- 3Suboxone MDL Mostly Survives Initial Preemption Challenge
- 4Paul Hastings Hires Music Industry Practice Chair From Willkie in Los Angeles
- 5Global Software Firm Trying to Jump-Start Growth Hands CLO Post to 3-Time Legal Chief
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250