Judge in Elizabeth Holmes Fraud Case Pushes Forward With Summer Trial Date Despite COVID-19
Lance Wade of Williams & Connolly, one of the Theranos founder's lawyers, said Wednesday that social distancing restrictions had made it "close to impossible" for the defense to prepare for the trial set to begin in August.
April 01, 2020 at 04:50 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Recorder
The federal judge overseeing the criminal fraud case against Elizabeth Holmes on Wednesday held off suspending an August trial date for the founder of blood-testing company Theranos.
U.S. District Judge Edward Davila also took issue with the tone of a proposed order from Holmes' lawyers at Williams & Connolly, who asked that their work on the case be deemed "essential" so they could continue with her trial preparation.
Williams & Connolly's Lance Wade said during a telephonic hearing Wednesday that the proposed order was designed to allow Holmes' lawyers to do things such as arrange for service of trial subpoenas and travel, and that it wasn't meant to force the judge's hand into issuing an order allowing lawyers to violate state and local rules meant to curb the spread of the coronavirus.
"I assure you as someone who has a brother who is a first responder, I in no way seek to downplay this crisis," Wade said. "I in no way want to put the court in a difficult position."
Davila on March 20 severed Holmes' trial from her co-defendant, former Theranos president and COO Ramesh "Sunny" Balwani, but indicated that he planned to move forward with the Holmes trial as scheduled. Davila's order, which said there was "good cause" to sever the trials but did not elaborate further, was handed down after the Northern District of California closed its courtrooms to civil hearings and suspended the start of new trials until at least May in moves meant to address the coronavirus pandemic.
Davila at Wednesday's hearing said the "tone" of the proposed order asked him to acknowledge the seriousness of the current pandemic while also giving lawyers the authority to violate the local rules designed to abate it.
Wade and his colleagues initially asked for a September trial date, but had indicated that they would be able to prepare for a late July jury selection and early August trial if the government held to all applicable discovery deadlines. Wade said that because of government delays in document production and the complications of litigating during the ongoing pandemic, the defense team had "walked into Mt. Everest" and that it had become "close to impossible" to adequately prepare as scheduled.
Davila said that many of the complications that Holmes' lawyers are facing also face federal prosecutors, and that many of the tasks that need to be done can be accomplished remotely by reviewing documents digitally, and conducting meetings and witness interviews by videoconference. "Of course there's recognition of this pandemic and what it does and that's not lost on me," said Davila, adding that he had kept the trial date in hopes of keeping both the government and the defense lawyers making progress on preparing the case for trial.
Davila, however, said he worried that even in July potential jurors might be reluctant to sit in close quarters for the weeks that the trial is set to last. "What is our jury pool going to look like and be like in July?" Davila asked. "What's the national condition going to be given this current scourge that we are facing?"
The judge ultimately asked Holmes' lawyers and prosecutors to meet and confer about the feasibility of proceeding with the current trial date and report back to him in two weeks.
"The landscape changes daily and the most important thing is everyone's health," the judge said.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLitigators of the Week: Jeffrey Kessler and Steve Berman Reach a Settlement With the NCAA that Reshapes College Sports
A Reporter and a Mayor: Behind the Scenes During the Eric Adams Indictment News Cycle
'The Most Peculiar Federal Court in the Country' Comes to Berkeley Law
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Dechert partners Andrew J. Levander, Angela M. Liu and Neil A. Steiner have stepped in to defend Arbor Realty Trust and certain executives in a pending securities class action. The complaint, filed July 31 in New York Eastern District Court by Levi & Korsinsky, contends that the defendants concealed a 'toxic' mobile home portfolio, vastly overstated collateral in regards to the company's loans and failed to disclose an investigation of the company by the FBI. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Pamela K. Chen, is 1:24-cv-05347, Martin v. Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Arthur G. Jakoby, Ryan Feeney and Maxim M.L. Nowak from Herrick Feinstein have stepped in to defend Charles Dilluvio and Seacor Capital in a pending securities lawsuit. The complaint, filed Sept. 30 in New York Southern District Court by the Securities and Exchange Commission, accuses the defendants of using consulting agreements, attorney opinion letters and other mechanisms to skirt regulations limiting stock sales by affiliate companies and allowing the defendants to unlawfully profit from sales of Enzolytics stock. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Andrew L. Carter Jr., is 1:24-cv-07362, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Zhabilov et al.
Who Got The Work
Clark Hill members Vincent Roskovensky and Kevin B. Watson have entered appearances for Architectural Steel and Associated Products in a pending environmental lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 27 in Pennsylvania Eastern District Court by Brodsky & Smith on behalf of Hung Trinh, accuses the defendant of discharging polluted stormwater from its steel facility without a permit in violation of the Clean Water Act. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Gerald J. Pappert, is 2:24-cv-04490, Trinh v. Architectural Steel And Associated Products, Inc.
Who Got The Work
Michael R. Yellin of Cole Schotz has entered an appearance for S2 d/b/a the Shoe Surgeon, Dominic Chambrone a/k/a Dominic Ciambrone and other defendants in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed July 15 in New York Southern District Court by DLA Piper on behalf of Nike, seeks to enjoin Ciambrone and the other defendants in their attempts to build an 'entire multifaceted' retail empire through their unauthorized use of Nike’s trademark rights. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald, is 1:24-cv-05307, Nike Inc. v. S2, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Sullivan & Cromwell partner Adam S. Paris has entered an appearance for Orthofix Medical in a pending securities class action arising from a proposed acquisition of SeaSpine by Orthofix. The suit, filed Sept. 6 in California Southern District Court, by Girard Sharp and the Hall Firm, contends that the offering materials and related oral communications contained untrue statements of material fact. According to the complaint, the defendants made a series of misrepresentations about Orthofix’s disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting and ethical compliance. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Linda Lopez, is 3:24-cv-01593, O'Hara v. Orthofix Medical Inc. et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250