O'Melveny Shakes $54M Malpractice Case Claiming It Cheated Ex-Client
Veteran law firm defender Kevin Rosen of Gibson Dunn said the ruling sends a message to the bankruptcy trustee who brought the case: Time to move on.
April 03, 2020 at 03:04 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Recorder
Absent a reversal by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, O'Melveny & Myers has finally shaken off a $54 million legal malpractice lawsuit filed by a former client's bankruptcy trustee.
A California federal judge on Wednesday dismissed the remaining claims of trustee Jeffrey Golden, who accused the firm of fraudulently transferring millions of dollars from client Aletheia Research and Management for legal fees just before it filed for bankruptcy.
U.S. District Judge Christina Snyder of the Central District of California found that Golden could not relitigate the issue of legal fees charged by O'Melveny and two of its lawyers, Steven Olson and Jorge deNeve, because an arbitrator had already sided with the law firm on the question.
Snyder in November approved that arbitration award, which absolved O'Melveny of other legal malpractice claims Golden alleged. Golden's appeal of Snyder's ruling is pending before the Ninth Circuit.
The arbitrator "'necessarily decided' the reasonableness of O'Melveny's fees," Snyder wrote, noting that Golden "pursued a claim for legal malpractice based in part on allegations that O'Melveny charged Aletheia 'exorbitant fees and costs,'" and then lost.
Snyder also denied Golden, a partner at Weiland Golden Goodrich serving as Aletheia's Chapter 7 trustee, the opportunity to file an amended complaint, finding it would create an undue delay in the nearly 5-and-a-half-year-old lawsuit and would prejudice O'Melveny.
Snyder also held that allowing Golden to file an amended complaint would be an act of futility—none of the additional facts Golden is alleging would "allow him to overcome the final award's preclusive effects on his preference and fraudulent transfer claims."
In a statement, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher senior partner Kevin Rosen said Snyder's decision vindicates his client O'Melveny's representation of Aletheia.
"We are gratified that the District Court has rejected the trustee's claims on summary judgment, consistent with the arbitrator's total rejection of all of his meritless attacks and frivolous theories following 12 days of testimony and argument," Rosen said. "O'Melveny provided first class legal services to Aletheia, which saved the company from serious exposure on multiple fronts. It's now time for the trustee finally to accept that the company's subsequent demise had nothing to do with O'Melveny and to move on."
Rosen, based in Los Angeles, chairs Gibson Dunn's law firm defense practice group.
Golden accused O'Melveny and its lawyers of fraudulently transferring at least $9.7 million out of Aletheia for legal fees from 2009 to 2011, as well as being conflicted in their representation of both Aletheia and its principal founder and majority shareholder, Peter Eichler.
Golden accused Eichler of looting his own company as Aletheia stared down a lawsuit from Proctor Investment Managers. O'Melveny represented Aletheia for part of its fight with Proctor; it withdrew from representing Aletheia, and another firm took over in early 2012 after multiple attempts to settle the litigation.
Golden also said arbitrator Gary Feess was biased against him because Feess allegedly blamed Golden for his son's failure to secure summer associate positions at both O'Melveny and Gibson Dunn. But Snyder rejected Golden's contention when she approved the arbitration award in November.
Golden's lawyers at the law firm Brutzkus Gubner did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
|Read More
O'Melveny Seeks Dismissal of Remaining $54M Legal Malpractice Suit
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrying a Case for Abu Ghraib Detainees Two Decades After Abuse
Litigators of the Week: Simpson Thacher and ACLU Team To Challenge Louisiana's Ten Commandments Law
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 13 New Judges: Here's Who Kemp Just Appointed to the Bench
- 2Apple Asks Judge to 'Follow the Majority Practice' in Dismissing Patent Dispute Over Night Vision Technology
- 3Texas Supreme Court to Review "Implied" Performance Controversy in Oil-Gas Leases
- 4Collections Are Critical for Texas Law Firms Through Year's End
- 5US Judge Rejects Investor Claim That Target Hid Pandemic Inventory Issues
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250