Daily Dicta: Sorry, But Gun Stores Should Be the Opposite of Essential Right Now
Fear is a central animating force in recent lawsuits filed by the National Rifle Association and other pro-gun groups against officials in New York and California, demanding that firearms retailers be designated as essential businesses and allowed to remain open during the pandemic.
April 05, 2020 at 11:00 PM
6 minute read
"We should get a gun," my husband said when the COVID-19 lockdown first began in California three weeks ago.
A former U.S. Army officer, he knows how to use a firearm responsibly and competently.
I, on the other hand, am … how shall I put it? Not a gun person. When I was pregnant with our first child 21 years ago, I insisted there would be no guns in our house.
But these are unprecedented times. It's not so hard to imagine a bleak future where the prisons are emptied, the police are decimated by the virus and we're all on our own to defend our homes/ castles against marauding thugs intent on stealing our … toilet paper? Lysol wipes? Cans of baked beans? Who knows? The world suddenly seems a lot scarier.
Indeed, fear is a central animating force in recent lawsuits filed by the National Rifle Association and other pro-gun groups against officials in New York and California, demanding that firearms retailers be designated as essential businesses and allowed to remain open during the pandemic.
"The current public health emergency does not justify impeding the exercise of Second Amendment rights, especially during a time when many New Yorkers have valid concerns about the ability of the government to maintain order—and criminals are being prematurely released from jails," states the NRA's complaint against New York Governor Andrew Cuomo and other officials, which was filed on April 2 by William A. Brewer III of Brewer, Attorneys and Counselors in the Northern District of New York.
"Many New York citizens and residents desiring to purchase firearms and ammunition have experienced empty shelves, long lines and tense atmospheres while shopping for other essential goods," Brewer continues. "They have read about the release of thousands of prisoners by state officials, and they are concerned about the ability of police forces to maintain order when officers fear contact with COVID-19 or have fallen ill themselves."
The California complaint, which was filed on March 27 by George Lee of Seiler Epstein in the Central District of California on behalf of the NRA as well as individual plaintiffs, retailers and other gun groups, strikes a similar chord.
"[T]he need for enhanced safety during uncertain times is precisely when plaintiffs and their members must be able to exercise their fundamental rights to keep and bear arms," Lee writes. "[F]irearms and ammunition retailers arguably provide the most essential business function possible by enabling Californians to lawfully defend themselves, their loved ones and their property."
It all sounds very apocalyptic, but here's a funny thing: Even in New York, where things are the worst, crime is actually down. According to the New York Police Department, in the last two weeks of March, there was a 25% decrease in the number of murders; a 10% decrease in robberies; and a 37% decrease in grand larcenies compared to the same period in 2019.
The Hill reported that crime is also down in Los Angeles, Chicago, Atlanta and Denver.
I'm not suggesting there could never be a situation where law and order failed and someone needed a gun for self-defense. But if a bunch of people go out and panic-buy guns—especially people with no training or experience in how to use them? And then they bring them home, where they're cooped up with their families, not to mention stressed out, worried about money, socially isolated and possibly depressed—and when domestic violence reports are on the rise?
I'm pretty sure that adding a gun into the mix is not a good idea.
Besides, this isn't the time to go out shopping—for guns or anything else. This is the time to stay home.
Nonetheless, on March 28, the Department of Homeland Security released non-binding guidance on what state and local governments should consider to be "critical infrastructure workforce." DHS included "Workers supporting the operation of firearm or ammunition product manufacturers, retailers, importers, distributors, and shooting ranges" on the list.
After the DHS guidance was issued, Los Angeles County Sheriff Alex Villanueva, a defendant in the California lawsuit, backed down. While he previously said that "gun and ammunition stores are not considered essential businesses and must close to the general public," he reversed course on March 30 said stores that fall under his jurisdiction can stay open—which he says makes the case against him moot.
Likewise, lawyers representing Governor Newsom said his March 20 shelter in place order "does not mandate the closure of firearms and ammunition retailers. To the extent any local official acting on his or her own authority requires the closure of those retailers, such actions do not concern the Executive Order."
That leaves lawyers representing Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti to defend shuttering the city's gun stores.
They begin by stressing that nothing in the mayor's "Safer at Home" order prohibits anyone from lawfully possessing firearms.
"The mayor's order instead deems commerce in innumerable kinds of goods and services, including commerce in firearms, to be a non-essential activity during the COVID-19 pandemic," wrote deputy city attorney Jonathan H. Eisenman. "At bottom, plaintiffs are asking this court hurriedly to second-guess the mayor's considered effort to address a public health emergency through a temporary measure that treats all non-essential commerce equally, neither specifically targeting guns nor prohibiting gun ownership or possession."
The order, Eisenman continued, "closes all non-essential businesses in the city, a sweep that includes thousands more businesses than the 18 stores within city limits that sell guns or ammunition or both. It is a broad commercial regulation made for the benefit of public health; it is not a firearms regulation."
In other words, the Second Amendment doesn't cover the right to go shopping during a pandemic.
In New York, Attorney General Letitia James also vowed to fight. "Everyone, including the NRA, must follow the law and all executive orders of New York," she tweeted. "We will aggressively defend the state against yet another legal assault by the NRA."
See also: NRA, Arguing Gun Shops Are 'Essential,' Sues New York Over Cuomo's COVID-19 Executive Order
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrying a Case for Abu Ghraib Detainees Two Decades After Abuse
Why Lewis Roca's Doug Tumminello Treks to Ukraine to Offer Material and Moral Support in Fight Against Russia
Litigators of the Week: In Largest MDL to Date, 3M Settles for $6B With Veterans Claiming Hearing Damage
Litigators of the Week: Willkie's $455M Win Against Iran for US Soldiers Hurt or Killed in Terrorism Attacks in Iraq
Trending Stories
- 1The Rise and Risks of Merchant Cash Advance Debt Relief Companies
- 2Ill. Class Action Claims Cannabis Companies Sell Products with Excessive THC Content
- 3Suboxone MDL Mostly Survives Initial Preemption Challenge
- 4Paul Hastings Hires Music Industry Practice Chair From Willkie in Los Angeles
- 5Global Software Firm Trying to Jump-Start Growth Hands CLO Post to 3-Time Legal Chief
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250