Hear Ye: US Supreme Court Sets Audio Arguments for Select Cases in May
Among the cases the justices said they would hear in May include the dispute over Trump's financial records, an Obamacare case and the controversy over "faithless electors."
April 13, 2020 at 10:19 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
The U.S. Supreme Court, following steps taken by many federal and state courts in response to the coronavirus pandemic and the closure of courthouses, announced on Monday it will hear arguments by teleconference in select cases next month.
The justices will schedule six days of arguments—May 4, 5, 6, 11, 12, 13—with the justices and advocates participating remotely. The court also will provide a live audio feed of those arguments to the news media, according to the court's public information office.
The previously postponed cases that the justices have now selected include the battle over access to President Donald Trump's financial records by a state grand jury and two U.S. House investigating committees; a First Amendment challenge to two states' "faithless elector" laws, and the Trump administration's defense of its expanded "conscience exemption" for objectors to providing contraceptive health insurance under the Affordable Care Act.
The court said it would announce later the assigned dates for the cases to be argued in May. The court picked 10 individual cases—some, such as the Trump financial records disputes and the Obamacare matter, have been consolidated—to hear in May.
The justices postponed the March and April oral arguments, which would have included 20 cases. The postponements, while rare, were not unprecedented. The justices did not hold arguments for October 1918 because of the Spanish flu epidemic. And the court shortened its argument calendars in August 1793 and August 1798 in response to yellow fever outbreaks.
The Court also tells arguing counsel that the remainder of the postponed March and April arguments will be conducted "early in the 2020 Term." https://t.co/NKcILA2Gpl
— Sean Marotta (@smmarotta) April 13, 2020
The justices faced a range of options for dealing with the postponed argument sessions and the remainder of the term. Those options included deciding pending cases solely on the briefs submitted by the parties, moving some cases into the October 2020 term or extending the current term's usual ending time past late June with potential arguments in late summer or early fall. Some state supreme court courts have embraced video technology to hear arguments during the virus crisis.
Despite the deferred arguments, the justices have gone forward with other business. The court has been holding its regularly scheduled private conferences when the justices go through newly filed petitions and other matters. Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. has presided over those meetings in the court's conference room while the other justices have participated remotely by teleconference. The court has been posting on its website orders containing grants and denials of review as well as decisions in already argued cases.
The court's iconic building in downtown Washington, across the street from the U.S. Capitol, remains closed to the public.
Read more:
US Supreme Court Is Urged to Suspend Paper Filing Requirement
SCOTUS, Canceling More Arguments, Says 'Other Alternatives' Are on the Table
New Normal Sets In for White-Collar Lawyers in the Virus Era
How the Pandemic Will Impact the Trump-Backed Lawsuit Against Obamacare
For Supreme Court Advocates, Virus-Era Delays Pose 'Stay Fresh' Challenge
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWith DEI Rollbacks, Employment Lawyers See Potential For Targeting Corporate Commitment to Equality
7 minute readMoFo Associate Sees a Familiar Face During Her First Appellate Argument: Justice Breyer
Amid the Tragedy of the L.A. Fires, a Lesson on the Value of Good Neighbors
Trending Stories
- 1The Rise and Risks of Merchant Cash Advance Debt Relief Companies
- 2Ill. Class Action Claims Cannabis Companies Sell Products with Excessive THC Content
- 3Suboxone MDL Mostly Survives Initial Preemption Challenge
- 4Paul Hastings Hires Music Industry Practice Chair From Willkie in Los Angeles
- 5Global Software Firm Trying to Jump-Start Growth Hands CLO Post to 3-Time Legal Chief
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250