Ticketmaster Sued by Concertgoers Over Refund Policy Change Amid Coronavirus
The lawsuit claims Ticketmaster Entertainment Inc. and its parent company, Live Nation Entertainment Co., retroactively changed refund policies in the wake of COVID-19.
April 20, 2020 at 01:55 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Recorder
A San Francisco man who says he had to eat nearly $600 in Rage Against the Machine concert tickets is seeking to represent a class action of would-be concertgoers who have not received Ticketmaster refunds for their postponed events as the entertainment industry complies with coronavirus shelter-in-place orders.
The Gutride Safier law firm in San Francisco, which filed the complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California on Friday, claims Ticketmaster Entertainment Inc. and its parent company, Live Nation Entertainment Co., retroactively changed policies on March 14 to no longer refund postponed events, only canceled ones.
Ticketmaster's original refund policy was a primary reason users have been willing to pay premium prices for tickets and substantial fees directly to the ticket sales company, wrote Gutride Safier's Adam Gutride, Seth Safier and Marie McCrary in the complaint.
"A major component of Ticketmaster's value is that refunds would be available for postponed or rescheduled events. Customers that purchased tickets prior to March 13, 2020, including Plaintiff, relied upon this representation at the time that they purchased tickets from Ticketmaster. This statement was a material term of the purchase contracts," they wrote.
Ticketmaster did not respond to a request for comment Monday morning.
The proposed class action follows a flurry of lawsuits against universities, gyms, airlines and theme parks for failure to refund consumers after closures as a result of COVID-19.
Plaintiff Derek Hansen is suing for breach of contract; conversion; unjust enrichment; false advertising; common-law fraud, deceit or misrepresentation; and unlawful, unfair, and fraudulent trade practices.
Hansen is asking the court to order Ticketmaster to pay damages, as well as refund tickets to postponed concerts purchased before March 30. He purchased tickets to two Rage Against the Machine concerts on Feb. 12 totaling $590. The concerts were "indefinitely postponed."
The complaint asserts that "around 30,000 events have already been postponed as a result of the coronavirus outbreak. By some estimates, consumers have spent more than $1 billion on tickets to disrupted events." The suit also seeks an injunction to prohibit defendants from continuing to engage in advertising and marketing practices alleged to be false, misleading and deceptive.
"Yet, Live Nation's president recently predicted that live events will not occur again until fall 2021 at the earliest," the complaint said.
Gutride Safier did not return a request for comment at the time of publication.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWith DEI Rollbacks, Employment Lawyers See Potential For Targeting Corporate Commitment to Equality
7 minute readMoFo Associate Sees a Familiar Face During Her First Appellate Argument: Justice Breyer
Amid the Tragedy of the L.A. Fires, a Lesson on the Value of Good Neighbors
Trending Stories
- 1The Rise and Risks of Merchant Cash Advance Debt Relief Companies
- 2Ill. Class Action Claims Cannabis Companies Sell Products with Excessive THC Content
- 3Suboxone MDL Mostly Survives Initial Preemption Challenge
- 4Paul Hastings Hires Music Industry Practice Chair From Willkie in Los Angeles
- 5Global Software Firm Trying to Jump-Start Growth Hands CLO Post to 3-Time Legal Chief
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250