Is Someone Coaching Your Witness Off-Camera? In a Changing World, Litigators Adjust Strategies
"If a person has neck pain, the doctor is evaluating him over the phone, performing the physical through video conferencing and documenting the condition," one lawyer says. "At trial, both sides are going to harp on the fact that the doctor can't put his hands on the patient and can't feel the spasms."
April 22, 2020 at 02:55 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Daily Business Review
Litigators pride themselves on their courtroom expertise and right now, some are making unprecedented preparations to win their next case.
Judd Gordon Rosen, the managing partner of Goldberg & Rosen, is preparing for a world where jury trials are delayed until 2021.
"Insurance companies are banking on the fact that there is no end in sight for a trial, and it will make them less likely to want to pay," Rosen said. "Insurance companies usually don't pay out of the goodness of their hearts. They pay because if they don't pay, it's going to hurt worse than if they do pay."
That does not mean that Rosen won't arrange for his clients to have medical services in the interim. Physical therapy clinics are still open, but he says some of his clients are reluctant to go to their appointments. Neurologists and orthopedic clinics are much better, as they have embraced virtual appointments.
Yet, Rosen says there are drawbacks when a client who was a victim in a car accident, for instance, obtains medical help through an appointment with a health care provider via telephone, or telemedicine.
"If a person has neck pain, the doctor is evaluating him over the phone, performing the physical through video conferencing and documenting the condition," Rosen said. "At trial, both sides are going to harp on the fact that the doctor can't put his hands on the patient and can't feel the spasms."
For instance, Rosen says, if the client has other pains, the physician will not be able to personally conduct a straight leg raising test. This test is used to measure back pain. Despite the limitations on physician examinations conducted by telemedicine, Rosen hopes that a jury will be sensitive to what his client has had to live through during this pandemic.
"But if a jury that has to live through this crisis, hears that a person is doing all they can, they will be understanding," Rosen said,
Andrew S. Berman, a partner at Young, Berman, Karpf & Gonzalez, says the last couple of weeks for his firm have been seamless, but Berman shares similar worries to Rosen.
In his practice, Berman is still using the services of investigators and expert witnesses. However, he notes their techniques have been modified, given the requirement of social distancing.
Like his investigators and expert witnesses, Berman too had to adjust to a new normal. The attorney says one of his main concerns involves deposing a critical witness remotely. With the computer camera focused solely on the witness, Berman can't see who else might be in the room with the witness and possibly coaching the witness' answers.
"It could be manipulated through text messages or other means. So there is a little bit of a concern about hoping everyone is acting honestly, ethically and professionally in these situations," he said. "If you have a witness in a room somewhere, you don't know what type of information they're getting outside of the room. But if you are sitting in a table right across from them, you know exactly what is going on."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLitigators of the Week: After a 74-Day Trial, Shook Fends Off Claims From Artist’s Heirs Against UMB Bank
An ‘Indiana Jones Moment’: Mayer Brown’s John Nadolenco and Kelly Kramer on the 10-Year Legal Saga of the Bahia Emerald
‘It's Your Funeral’: Avoiding Doing Damage to Your Client’s Case With Uncivil Behavior
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250