Is Someone Coaching Your Witness Off-Camera? In a Changing World, Litigators Adjust Strategies
"If a person has neck pain, the doctor is evaluating him over the phone, performing the physical through video conferencing and documenting the condition," one lawyer says. "At trial, both sides are going to harp on the fact that the doctor can't put his hands on the patient and can't feel the spasms."
April 22, 2020 at 02:55 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Daily Business Review
Litigators pride themselves on their courtroom expertise and right now, some are making unprecedented preparations to win their next case.
Judd Gordon Rosen, the managing partner of Goldberg & Rosen, is preparing for a world where jury trials are delayed until 2021.
"Insurance companies are banking on the fact that there is no end in sight for a trial, and it will make them less likely to want to pay," Rosen said. "Insurance companies usually don't pay out of the goodness of their hearts. They pay because if they don't pay, it's going to hurt worse than if they do pay."
That does not mean that Rosen won't arrange for his clients to have medical services in the interim. Physical therapy clinics are still open, but he says some of his clients are reluctant to go to their appointments. Neurologists and orthopedic clinics are much better, as they have embraced virtual appointments.
Yet, Rosen says there are drawbacks when a client who was a victim in a car accident, for instance, obtains medical help through an appointment with a health care provider via telephone, or telemedicine.
"If a person has neck pain, the doctor is evaluating him over the phone, performing the physical through video conferencing and documenting the condition," Rosen said. "At trial, both sides are going to harp on the fact that the doctor can't put his hands on the patient and can't feel the spasms."
For instance, Rosen says, if the client has other pains, the physician will not be able to personally conduct a straight leg raising test. This test is used to measure back pain. Despite the limitations on physician examinations conducted by telemedicine, Rosen hopes that a jury will be sensitive to what his client has had to live through during this pandemic.
"But if a jury that has to live through this crisis, hears that a person is doing all they can, they will be understanding," Rosen said,
Andrew S. Berman, a partner at Young, Berman, Karpf & Gonzalez, says the last couple of weeks for his firm have been seamless, but Berman shares similar worries to Rosen.
In his practice, Berman is still using the services of investigators and expert witnesses. However, he notes their techniques have been modified, given the requirement of social distancing.
Like his investigators and expert witnesses, Berman too had to adjust to a new normal. The attorney says one of his main concerns involves deposing a critical witness remotely. With the computer camera focused solely on the witness, Berman can't see who else might be in the room with the witness and possibly coaching the witness' answers.
"It could be manipulated through text messages or other means. So there is a little bit of a concern about hoping everyone is acting honestly, ethically and professionally in these situations," he said. "If you have a witness in a room somewhere, you don't know what type of information they're getting outside of the room. But if you are sitting in a table right across from them, you know exactly what is going on."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWith DEI Rollbacks, Employment Lawyers See Potential For Targeting Corporate Commitment to Equality
7 minute readMoFo Associate Sees a Familiar Face During Her First Appellate Argument: Justice Breyer
Amid the Tragedy of the L.A. Fires, a Lesson on the Value of Good Neighbors
Trending Stories
- 1The Rise and Risks of Merchant Cash Advance Debt Relief Companies
- 2Ill. Class Action Claims Cannabis Companies Sell Products with Excessive THC Content
- 3Suboxone MDL Mostly Survives Initial Preemption Challenge
- 4Paul Hastings Hires Music Industry Practice Chair From Willkie in Los Angeles
- 5Global Software Firm Trying to Jump-Start Growth Hands CLO Post to 3-Time Legal Chief
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250