IP Boutique Partner Allegedly Faked Trips to 43 Cities and Charged His Firm
A former partner at Chicago's McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff is accused of submitting nearly 400 false expense claims, demanding more than $360,000 from the firm for bogus trips across a broad swath of North America.
May 06, 2020 at 06:27 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
Illinois attorney disciplinary authorities are pressing allegations that a Chicago partner at a 75-lawyer intellectual property boutique falsified hundreds of expense reimbursement claims to his former firm.
The complaint, filed April 28 to the Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission, alleged that Thomas Wettermann, a former partner at McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff, submitted 382 false reimbursement claims—totaling $361,646.47—to the firm between January 2015 and December 2019.
The allegations read like a Johnny Cash song: The complaint says Wettermann faked travel to Brookfield, Oshkosh, Milwaukee, Madison, Appleton and Green Bay, Wisconsin; Wauconda, Rockford, Cary, Crystal Lake and Vernon Hills, Illinois; Indianapolis, South Bend, West Lafayette and Fort Wayne, Indiana; Austin, Dallas and Houston, Texas; Los Angeles, San Francisco, San Jose and Orange County, California; Charlotte and Raleigh, North Carolina; Charleston, South Carolina; Minneapolis and St. Paul, Minnesota; Kalamazoo, Michigan; Columbus, Ohio; Phoenix; Fort Lauderdale and Miami, Florida; Atlanta; Newark, New Jersey; Washington, D.C.; Boston; St. Louis; Binghamton and New York City; Philadelphia; Arlington, Virginia; Toronto, Ontario; and Vancouver, British Columbia.
Wettermann allegedly purchased travel reservations, canceled them, and then submitted the original proof of purchase to McDonnell Boehnen, where he had worked for nearly 23 years, to receive reimbursement for expenses he had not actually paid for trips he did not take. (Wettermann was an associate at Brinks Hofer Gilson & Lione earlier in his career.)
McDonnell Boehnen repaid Wetterman $1,171.67 in 2015 for three falsified expenses; $37,600.19 in 2016 for at least 68 falsified expenses; $66,448.88 in 2017 for at least 116 false expenses; $82,836.95 in 2018 for at least 104 false expenses; and $91,807.46 in 2019 for at least 91 false expenses, the ARDC alleged.
In all, Wettermann asked for, and received, $279,865.15 in reimbursement for travel not actually taken. According to the complaint, a review by the firm found an additional $81,771.32 undocumented travel expenses paid out to him.
While the complaint says Wettermann wrote off the fraudulent charges from clients' bills in most cases, reclassifying client-related matters as business development for the firm, he was not entirely successful. The administrator alleged that at least four times, and to the tune of $4,624.96, Wettermann's fraudulent travel charges were passed along to, and paid by, clients, although the firm eventually reimbursed them when it discovered the payments.
After McDonnell Boehnen reviewed Wettermann's finances last year and uncovered the alleged fraud, he repaid the firm $100,000 in partial restitution in November. Later, he paid another $20,000 in restitution and forfeited his capital amount and part of his monthly draw. The firm fired him in December, according to the complaint.
Neither Wettermann nor representatives for McDonnell Boehnen responded to requests for comment on the complaint.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLitigation Leaders: Greenspoon Marder’s Beth-Ann Krimsky on What Makes Her Team ‘Prepared, Compassionate and Wicked Smart’
Why the Founders of IP Boutique Fisch Sigler Are Stepping Away From the Law and Starting an AI Venture
‘How to Succeed as a Trial Lawyer’: Talking Shop With Author and Veteran Litigator Stewart Edelstein
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Trailblazing Broward Judge Retires; Legacy Includes Bush v. Gore
- 2Federal Judge Named in Lawsuit Over Underage Drinking Party at His California Home
- 3'Almost an Arms Race': California Law Firms Scooped Up Lateral Talent by the Handful in 2024
- 4Pittsburgh Judge Rules Loan Company's Online Arbitration Agreement Unenforceable
- 5As a New Year Dawns, the Value of Florida’s Revised Mediation Laws Comes Into Greater Focus
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250