Class Action Alleges Two Traders Manipulated Calif. Gas Prices by $2.4B
"Our goal is to make California consumers whole after the defendants' alleged conduct cost consumers over $2 billion," said Milberg managing partner Glenn Phillips in the antitrust lawsuit.
May 14, 2020 at 03:30 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Recorder
A class action alleges two traders manipulated California's gas prices to the tune of $2.4 billion.
The antitrust lawsuit, filed on Wednesday, comes after California Attorney General Xavier Becerra filed a similar case earlier this month against the same two trading companies, who he accused of violating California unfair competition law by manipulating the "spot market" for wholesale gasoline and gasoline blending products following an Exxon Mobil refinery explosion in 2015 in Torrance, California. The refinery supplied about 10% of the gasoline in California.
"Our goal is to make California consumers whole after the defendants' alleged conduct cost consumers over $2 billion," said Milberg managing partner Glenn Phillips, whose New York firm filed the lawsuit, which alleges federal antitrust violations. Milberg partners David Azar, Peggy Wedgworth and Andrei Rado in New York, along with associate Blake Yagman, filed the lawsuit.
Both trading companies, Houston-based Vitol Inc., a subsidiary of Vitol Holding B.V. in the Netherlands, and Houston-based SK Energy Americas Inc., whose South Korean parent corporation, SK Trading International Ltd., also is a defendant in the complaint, did not respond to requests for comment.
The lawsuits come after the California Energy Commission suggested a year ago that market manipulation might have contributed to California's skyrocketing fuel prices, which also are higher because of taxes and emissions standards that require gasoline blending. California Gov. Gavin Newsom asked the attorney general to look into that possibility late last year.
Both suits say the trading companies made "sham transactions" and traded among themselves to spike the price of wholesale gasoline.
"Price gouging, whether it's toilet paper or gasoline, stinks," said Becerra, in a May 4 announcement of the state's lawsuit. "It's greed that hurts grandma, the Good Samaritan and everyday Americans. Every once in a while we get to fight back."
Milberg, which has filed class actions against Major League Baseball and Purdue University over unpaid refunds amid the coronavirus outbreak, filed its case in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California. The named plaintiff, Asante Cleveland, a San Diego resident who paid $39.79 at an Arco station on Aug. 8, 2016, brought the case on behalf of a class of millions of California residents who bought gas between Feb. 18, 2015, and the end of 2016.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLitigators of the Week: A $630M Antitrust Settlement for Automotive Software Vendors—$140M More Than Alleged Overcharges
A Second Straight Year of Increased Securities Filings—With Perhaps More on the Horizon
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250