Rep. Devin Nunes' Defamation Case Against CNN Transferred to Manhattan Federal Court
U.S. District Judge Robert E. Payne of the Eastern District of Virginia said it would be more convenient for the parties and witnesses to appear in Manhattan, where CNN is headquartered; he also said the California congressman has no clear ties to Richmond.
May 22, 2020 at 02:22 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on New York Law Journal
A Virginia federal judge on Friday granted CNN's request to transfer a defamation suit filed by U.S. Rep. Devin Nunes, R-California, to the Southern District of New York, finding there was "no logical connection" between the case and the Richmond, Virgnia, court where it was filed.
Nunes, a staunch defender of President Donald Trump in the Congress, last year sued the cable TV network in the Eastern District of Virginia over a Nov. 22 story that linked Nunes to an alleged plot to pressure Ukrainian officials to investigate Joe Biden, the former vice president and now the presumptive Democratic nominee for president.
The CNN report quoted Joe Bondy, an attorney for indicted Rudy Giuliani associate Lev Parnas, who said Nunes had met with Ukrainian Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin last December in Vienna. Parnas is set to stand trial later this year in Manhattan on campaign finance charges related to an alleged scheme to funnel foreign money into U.S. elections.
According to the report, Congressional travel records showed that Nunes and three aides traveled to Europe but did not include the trip to Vienna. The story also noted that Nunes was not required to disclose the exact details of the trip and said that CNN had reached out to Nunes and others for comment. Reporter Vicky Ward later went on CNN's Cuomo Prime Time program with Chris Cuomo to discuss the story.
Nunes claimed in his suit that CNN's coverage attempted to "accuse" or "impute" that he had committed felonies or crimes of moral turpitude and was unfit to "perform the duties of an office or employment for profit."
The two-count lawsuit alleges that CNN had acted with actual malice and had conspired with Parnas' attorneys to defame him. It seeks more than $435 million in damages.
In Friday's transfer order, U.S. District Judge Robert E. Payne of the Eastern District of Virginia said it would be more convenient for the parties and witnesses to appear in Manhattan, where CNN is headquartered and many of its employees live. Nunes himself had no clear ties to Richmond and would have to travel regardless of where the case proceeded, the judge said.
Payne also raised "significant concerns" over forum shopping, saying he had warned Nunes' attorney "on multiple occasions" that the court "cannot stand as a willing repository for which have no real nexus to this district."
"The Eastern District of Virginia is not Nunes' home forum, and there is no logical connection between the events in this case and this district," Payne wrote in a 17-page opinion.
Attorneys for Nunes and CNN did not respond Friday to requests for comment.
The case, captioned Nunes v. CNN, has been assigned to U.S. District Judge Laura Taylor Swain of the Southern District of New York.
CNN is represented by Kevin T. Baine, Dane H. Butswinkas and Stephen Fuzesi of Williams & Connolly.
Nunes' listed counsel in the case is Steven Scott Biss, a solo practitioner from Richmond.
READ MORE:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLitigators of the Week: After a 74-Day Trial, Shook Fends Off Claims From Artist’s Heirs Against UMB Bank
An ‘Indiana Jones Moment’: Mayer Brown’s John Nadolenco and Kelly Kramer on the 10-Year Legal Saga of the Bahia Emerald
‘It's Your Funeral’: Avoiding Doing Damage to Your Client’s Case With Uncivil Behavior
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250