Texas Attorneys Offer Free Help to People Arrested During Protests Over George Floyd's Death
Texas attorneys in Austin, Dallas and San Antonio are joining a national trend in which criminal-defense lawyers are taking cases of protesters' cases for free. Other attorneys who have done the same hail from California, New York, Florida and other states.
June 03, 2020 at 04:09 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Texas Lawyer
As a sign of solidarity with the Texans who are protesting George Floyd's death in Minneapolis, criminal-defense attorneys in the Lone Star State's major cities have pledged pro bono representation for arrested protesters.
Texas attorneys in Austin, Dallas and San Antonio are joining a national trend in which criminal-defense lawyers are taking cases of protesters' cases for free. Other attorneys who have done the same hail from California, New York, Florida, and other states.
"I thought it was the best and easiest way to do my part in helping change these disparities and fix the system," said Ted Wenske, partner in Wenske & Reyes in San Antonio. "I've seen a lot of police interactions with a lot of different people. I've seen disparities in how people of color and how white people are treated. It's time for change."
Wenske has accepted two cases of protesters arrested in San Antonio on Monday and Tuesday nights. He said one of his clients was leaving a protest and was pushed by a bicycle officer and forcibly detained, even through two witnesses told Wenske that "he was walking away peacefully." Another client was running away from police who were firing rubber bullets, and he picked up a charge.
Austin solo practitioner Tycha Kimbrough is now talking with 10 potential clients, and waiting them to sign engagement agreements, she said. She noted she's seeing mostly Class B and C misdemeanor charges for things like obstructing highways, criminal mischief and participating in a riot.
Kimbrough said she grew up in a marginalized, low-income community on the East side of San Antonio, and she knows that people cannot afford to hire lawyers.
"I figured I could give back and help people who are wrongly accused and arrested," she said. "I want to use my law degree to do good for my community."
In Dallas, criminal-defense firm Broden & Mickelsen has also pledged pro bono representation for protesters. Founding partner Clint Broden didn't immediately return a call seeking comment. The firm said in a statement that it strongly supports the protesters' rights to demonstrate, and it's a severe threat to American democracy to arrest peaceful protesters.
"Requiring those arrested for exercising their First Amendment rights to then have to pay for a lawyer further compounds the problem and stifles peaceful protests," the firm said. "We stand ready to do our part."
The phenomenon of criminal-defense counsel freely representing protesters is spreading across the nation.
In Miami, Eduardo Maura of Ayala Law established a program to take pro bono cases of victims of police abuse or those charged with crimes in protests, reported the Daily Business Review. The firm's attorneys have partnered with outside lawyers for the effort, and Maura has welcomed more attorneys to get involved.
The Midwest boutique Saeed & Little has taken on cases of 23 people in Chicago, 23 in Indianapolis and nine in Louisville, Kentucky, according to The American Lawyer. Some were charged for shoplifting or throwing tear gas canisters back at police, but others were swept up in mass arrests.
Joe Mastro, a criminal-defense lawyer in Berkeley, California, said that he tweeted out an announcement that he would take protesters' cases pro bono.
"I have not had anyone yet," Mastro said. "It felt like a way to help with a cause I believe in."
New York criminal-defense attorney Dan Lynch, who didn't return a call seeking comment, told Medill Reports Chicago that he wants to keep the protesters out of jail and would not turn anyone down.
"If a protester came up to me and they were arrested for doing something violent, that's still a part of my job," Lynch said.
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLitigators of the Week: After a 74-Day Trial, Shook Fends Off Claims From Artist’s Heirs Against UMB Bank
An ‘Indiana Jones Moment’: Mayer Brown’s John Nadolenco and Kelly Kramer on the 10-Year Legal Saga of the Bahia Emerald
‘It's Your Funeral’: Avoiding Doing Damage to Your Client’s Case With Uncivil Behavior
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250