Florida Chief Judge Is Clamping Down After Reports of Porn on Zoom, PDA and Attorneys With No Pants
One attorney appeared on the livestream wearing a business suit without any pants — a faux pas he inadvertently gave away by crossing his legs.
June 11, 2020 at 04:43 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Daily Business Review
When Broward Circuit Chief Judge Jack Tuter received a complaint from a member of the public who had tuned in to watch his court's first appearances broadcast online, it wasn't pretty.
One Broward assistant state attorney reportedly presented her case from bed, where she switched between lying on her back and stomach, while another appeared on the livestream wearing a business suit without any pants — a faux pas he inadvertently gave away by crossing his legs.
"You can see everybody's talking and he gets distracted, and he pushes himself away from his desk," Tuter said. "He's got a jacket and tie on, but you can see that he's not wearing pants because he puts his knee up on the table there."
Meanwhile, the complaint from the member of the public said that a private defense attorney had his personal computer behind him, which appeared to be playing an Instagram video of a woman "in the process of covering her breasts."
Another private defense attorney was sitting at his desk when a woman presumed to be his spouse entered to bring him the paper, and things got a bit steamy.
"The next thing you know, she's sitting in on his lap," Tuter said. "And finally, after a few seconds, he realizes, 'Oh my god,' and you can see him reach over to knock the camera down."
Though the incidents appear to be "innocent transgressions," Tuter said they should serve as a warning that attorneys need to be more careful about how they dress and behave on camera. He's emailed everyone involved in first appearances reminding them to stay alert.
"This is a court of law," Tuter said. "There are people watching from all over the country in many cases, and you would never ever engage in this kind of dress code or these kind of failings in a courtroom."
Judges don't always catch everything, Tuter said, since they're often reading the record and dealing with up to 10 people on screen at a time — but that doesn't mean the public won't.
The chief judge said he does understand that the COVID-19 pandemic means it's a strange time for everyone and that mishaps, involving children or dogs, for example, will happen. But other things are more controllable.
"It seems like every time I get on a Zoom hearing, the UPS guy comes and rings the doorbell, so where do the dogs go? Charging to the front door to protect the homestead," Tuter said. "But first appearance, it's a more confined environment. You have people pleading for their liberty there and they've just been arrested, and everything's fresh and raw when they come in front of the camera. I think we just need to be a little bit more vigilant about how we dress and the things that we do."
Broward Public Defender Howard Finkelstein noted that none of his lawyers landed on the wrong end of this — something he puts down to early interventions.
"We knew from the get-go this could be an issue. A new technology and a bunch of young lawyers — so we did several trainings on this early on," Finkelstein said. "We trained on dressing appropriately and being groomed appropriately. In order to avoid any possible embarrassment, we created a virtual Public Defender seal that they use for a backdrop. So far, my lawyers are looking and behaving appropriately. But the day is young."
Satz's office declined to comment, but Tuter says they're working together to correct the problem.
As attorneys get used to using Zoom, Tuter said he expects "we will get better at this." In the meantime, he'll be reaching out the criminal defense bar to make sure it's aware of the transgressions.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLitigators of the Week: After a 74-Day Trial, Shook Fends Off Claims From Artist’s Heirs Against UMB Bank
An ‘Indiana Jones Moment’: Mayer Brown’s John Nadolenco and Kelly Kramer on the 10-Year Legal Saga of the Bahia Emerald
‘It's Your Funeral’: Avoiding Doing Damage to Your Client’s Case With Uncivil Behavior
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250