Ex-Legal Assistant Brings Bias, Harassment Claims Against White & Case
Hannah Kim, who worked in the restructuring department in the firm's New York office, alleges she was the subject of an enduring harassment campaign by two supervisors after she returned from leave.
June 19, 2020 at 05:24 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on New York Law Journal
A former White & Case senior legal assistant has accused the firm of pregnancy discrimination and claims it denied her wages and vacation pay following her February departure.
In a complaint filed in Manhattan state court Thursday, Hannah Kim, who started working in the firm's restructuring group in 2013, alleges a pattern of harassment by her two supervisors on her return from maternity leave in 2016, as well as a string of inappropriate comments by the leader of the practice before she went on leave.
Kim also said her supervisors failed to make proper accommodations for her after she suffered a brain injury from a 2018 automobile accident. In addition to the firm, the suit names longtime White & Case director of legal assistants Carol Grajeda and employee Rita Masino as defendants.
"Plaintiff was subject to severe harassment by the individual defendants as a result of her need to express milk while at the office," Kim said in the complaint. "This harassment was continuous and ongoing until Plaintiff stopped expressing milk for her child at work in approximately the fall of 2018."
Kim, who is represented by Kara Miller of New York employment boutique Virginia & Ambinder, details how she was allegedly barred from using the lactation room at the firm's New York office because of its distance from her own office. Instead, she had a latch hook attached to her door to ensure privacy while pumping. But she said that Grajeda would repeatedly try to open the door while she was in the process, while Masino would regularly use the phone to interrupt her, citing immediate needs that turned out to be trivial.
Masino allegedly made critical comments about breastfeeding, stating Kim's son was now a "grown-ass boy," that breastfeeding was "hink," and that "formula was invented for a reason." She also allegedly critiqued the appearance of Kim's breasts and disparaged her nursing bras.
Kim also said that both women repeatedly cautioned her against getting pregnant again, with both suggesting that she "keep her legs closed" and Masino intimating that Grajeda would find a way to fire her if she did.
Kim also said that a former lawyer at the firm discussed his wife's pregnancy and labor and the effect of childbirth on women's bodies in a manner that made her uncomfortable, even after she'd told him so.
And she said that she was the recipient of harassment from Grajeda and Masino after she returned to the office after the car accident, following a fight about accommodations to work part time from home as she recovered.
Kim voluntarily left the firm in February after she was denied a bonus in 2019 and saw her year-end review repeatedly postponed, which she described as signs that she was going to be terminated. But she says she's yet to receive payment for her last scheduled paycheck as well as unused vacation days.
A spokesman for White & Case, where the complaint says Grajeda and Masino are still employed, declined to comment on the suit Friday.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLitigators of the Week: A Directed Verdict Win for Cisco in a West Texas Patent Case
With DEI Rollbacks, Employment Lawyers See Potential For Targeting Corporate Commitment to Equality
7 minute readMoFo Associate Sees a Familiar Face During Her First Appellate Argument: Justice Breyer
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 2Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 3Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
- 4Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
- 5Freshfields Hires Ex-SEC Corporate Finance Director in Silicon Valley
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250