And the LOTW Runners Up...
Shout outs this week to Beveridge & Diamond, Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton, Jenner & Block, Kirkland & Ellis, Quinn Emanuel, Sidley Austin, Shearman & Sterling, Skadden, Sullivan & Cromwell, and Williams & Connolly.
July 09, 2020 at 09:00 PM
6 minute read
Commence the drumroll for the first Litigator of the Week of my tenure. It's been a couple of weeks since we last handed out bragging rights, so that drumroll is going to be dramatically prolonged as we acknowledge a bunch of worthy runners-up.
First up is a win that a Beveridge & Diamond team led by partners James Slaughter, Gary Smith, and associates Megan Morgan and Jacob Duginski scored for Chiquita Canyon Landfill, which filed suit in 2017 challenging the Conditional Use Permit imposed on one of California's largest landfills by Los Angeles County. In a 62-page decision issued on July 2, Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Daniel Murphy struck or remanded 12 of the conditions imposed by the county, voiding estimated fees and costs of about $300 million dollars over the life of the landfill.
A Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton team led by partners David Herrington, Nowell Bamberger and Joon Hyun Kim scored a trade secrets win for client Medytox at the U.S. International Trade Commission. An administrative law judge at the ITC sided with Medytox and Allergan, represented by counsel at Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, finding on July 6 that South Korean bioengineering firm Daewoong Pharmaceuticals Co. Ltd. misappropriated trade secrets belonging to Medytox and used them to develop a botulinum neurotoxin product known as Jeuveau and imported it into the U.S. The findings are subject to review by the full Commission.
Meanwhile, a Jenner & Block team including appellate and Supreme Court practice chair Ian Heath Gershengorn, partners Ishan Bhabha and Alison Stein, and associate Jonathan Langlinais convinced the Fourth Circuit to reverse a lower court decision and revive a copyright infringement suit brought by the Recording Industry Association of America and member recording companies. The district court below had found that websites FLVTO.com and 2conv.com, which allow users to rip music from YouTube videos without the permission of copyright holders, didn't have sufficient connection with the U.S. to establish personal jurisdiction. But the Fourth Circuit found that the sites' founder knew they were accessible to users in the U.S. who allegedly used them for music piracy.
Also in the entertainment sphere, Kirkland & Ellis partners Sandra Goldstein and Stefan Atkinson scored a win at the Delaware Chancery Court for former officers and directors of Twenty-First Century Fox Inc., including Co-Executive Chairmen Rupert Murdoch and Lachlan Murdoch and Chief Executive Officer James Murdoch, in shareholder derivative litigation arising out the company's $73.1 billion merger with The Walt Disney Company. The team won a motion to dismiss the suit brought by a stockholder who brought claims of breach of fiduciary duty and unjust enrichment related to the grant of retention restricted stock units to the Murdochs as part of the Disney deal.
Quinn Emanuel partners Juan Morillo and David Cooper won a rare reversal of dismissal on forum non conveniens grounds at the 11th Circuit. The July 1 ruling will allow their clients, 39 plaintiffs who lost more than $1.1 billion in the collapse of Mexican oil services company Oceanografía, to pursue fraud claims back at the trial court against Citigroup, which provided credit facilities to the company.
In a long-running challenge to Arizona's capital punishment process, Sidley Austin partner Josh Anderson wrapped up six years of pro bono work for seven death-row prisoners in the state. Sidley's work resulted in a precedent-setting Ninth Circuit opinion extending the First Amendment's right of access to governmental proceedings to encompass sounds—a rebuke to the state's decision to turn off the audio feed from the execution chamber in the 2014 lethal injection of Joseph Wood. The firm's work also resulted in a settlement guaranteeing that Arizona won't carry out an execution using either midazolam or any other similar non-anesthetic drug in its class going forward.
Also from Sidley, partners Connie Trela and Steve Horowitz scored a win for clients Amgen and Immunex at the Federal Circuit, which found that the patents underlying the blockbuster $5 billion-a-year arthritis drug Enbrel were valid in the face of a challenge from competitor Sandoz. Amgen's stock price shot up more than 8% is the session following the July 1 opinion.
Shearman & Sterling partners Alan Goudiss and Mallory Brennan won a dismissal for client Altice USA, its board of directors and Altice Europe, in a securities class action pending in New York Supreme Court in Queens County. Justice Joseph Risi's June 26 decision was among the first in New York state courts to dismiss a federal Securities Act claim since the U.S. Supreme Court's Cyan, Inc. v. Beaver County Employees Retirement Fund decision clarified that such claims can be decided in state courts.
Also in front of Justice Risi in Queens, Skadden's Rob Fumerton got a Securities Act of 1933 case tossed in its entirety on motion to dismiss on July 7 for client RYB Education, a company focusing on early childhood education in China. The Skadden team notably convinced Risi to reverse an earlier decision of his and held that the heightened pleading standard of 3016(b) applies to Securities Act claims.
Steve Holley and Matthew Porpora of Sullivan & Cromwell helped client Fiat Chrysler Automobiles beat back a high-profile multi-billion RICO suit brought by General Motors. On July 8, U.S. District Judge Paul Borman in Detroit granted FCA's motion to dismiss rejecting GM's claims that it was harmed by an alleged bribery scheme involving payments that former FCA employees facilitated to United Auto Workers officials.
And finally, Lisa Blatt and the U.S. Supreme Court and appellate litigation team at Williams & Connolly upped their record to 3-0 at the High Court this term. With partner Sarah Harris leading the brief-writing, they won an 8-1 decision for client Booking.com, with the court holding that adding ".com" to a generic term can create a protectable trademark.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhy the Founders of IP Boutique Fisch Sigler Are Stepping Away From the Law and Starting an AI Venture
‘How to Succeed as a Trial Lawyer’: Talking Shop With Author and Veteran Litigator Stewart Edelstein
Litigation Leaders: Labaton’s Eric Belfi on Running Case Investigation, Analysis and Evaluation In-House
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250