New York Mayor Threatens to Sue Trump Administration if Federal Agents Are Deployed to City
President Donald Trump has defended recent actions by federal officers in Portland, Oregon as necessary to restore law and order, and threatened to take similar steps in other large cities, including New York, Chicago and Philadelphia.
July 22, 2020 at 03:33 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on New York Law Journal
Mayor Bill de Blasio and City Hall's top lawyer on Wednesday roundly rejected threats by President Donald Trump to send federal agents to quell protests in U.S. cities, as the New York City Bar Association likened the forces to an unlawful "standing army."
In public comments, de Blasio and corporation counsel Jim Johnson vowed to sue the Trump administration if federal agents were deployed in New York City, where protesters have gathered in mass demonstrations following the police killing of George Floyd in Minneapolis.
The federal government, through the Department of Homeland Security, has in recent weeks deployed security forces to Portland, Oregon, with the stated intention of protecting federal property there. However, reporting and video from the protests have shown the often-unidentified agents detaining demonstrators and placing them in unmarked cars.
Trump himself has remarked on the need to "dominate" the protests in U.S. cities, and Chad Wolf, the acting secretary of homeland security, said in a Fox News interview that he had the authority to "proactively arrest" people. Trump, meanwhile, has defended the actions as necessary to restore law and order and threatened to take similar steps in other large cities, like New York, Chicago and Philadelphia.
The statements have sparked outrage from Democratic politicians and local leaders, who have said they would refuse to accept the presence of federal law enforcement in their cities.
On Wednesday, de Blasio said that similar actions by the federal government in New York would be unnecessary and "counterproductive."
"I want to be very, very clear that we will not allow this to happen in our city. And this could only make things worse," de Blasio said, according to a transcript of the remarks.
"We don't take something like this lying down," he said. "We will not be intimidated. And if we see these federal officers on our streets, then we will see the Trump administration in court to stop it from happening."
In a letter Wednesday to Wolf and Attorney General William Barr, de Blasio added that the use of uniformed federal forces would only work to undermine the city's existing relationship agreements with U.S. Marshals and other agents to protect federal buildings.
Johnson, speaking alongside de Blasio at a press conference Wednesday morning, said that Trump was "inviting chaos to an already difficult situation" and that any unwelcome incursions by the federal government would be met with coordinated legal challenges from local officials.
"The constitution gives the state and the city quite clear responsibility for local law enforcement," Johnson said enforcement. "New York City is the safest big city in the United States. We will continue to keep it that way. And we will challenge this in court. I've been in touch with my counterparts in other cities and we are prepared and preparing to attack this in a coordinated way."
In its own statement, the City Bar called the actions in Portland a "threat to all Americans" and urged attorneys to fight back against what it said violated the U.S. Constitution.
"The use of federal agents in this way is equivalent to the standing army that was feared by our founders and cannot be accepted as 'normal' but rather as an action contrary to our history, tradition and democratic norms," the City Bar said.
"Lawyers everywhere have a special obligation to insist that our government comply with the laws and Constitution that embody our nation's deepest values, and to make clear, in words and responsible action, that those federal officials who authorize, direct or carry out such violent and unlawful actions must be held accountable under the law."
The mayor's comments came as he is under increased pressure over his handling of the protests in New York City, as well as his controversial decision to forcibly remove protesters from an encampment outside of City Hall early Wednesday morning. Protesters there had been camped out for over a month demanding that the city cut $1 billion from the New York City Police Department's $6 billion budget and reinvest the funds into social programs.
READ MORE:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLitigators of the Week: Simpson Thacher and ACLU Team To Challenge Louisiana's Ten Commandments Law
A Reporter and a Mayor: Behind the Scenes During the Eric Adams Indictment News Cycle
Even With New Business Courts, Texas Is a Long Way from Taking Delaware's Corporate Law Mantle
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1CFPB Alleges Berkshire Hathaway Subsidiary Originated Unaffordable Housing Loans
- 2Hogan Lovells Focuses on Corporate and Finance for 2025 Partner Promotions
- 3What I Wish I Knew Then: Richard Esposito
- 4In First Appeal of 2025, NY Top Court Eyes Ethics Watchdog, Cuomo's Book Deal
- 5Ex-Jenkens & Gilchrist Lawyer Convicted in Tax Shelter Scheme is Among Biden's Commutations
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250