A Big Bunch of Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout Outs
Runners up this week include teams from Cooley, Paul Hastings, Wilson Sonsini, and Winston & Strawn.
November 13, 2020 at 07:25 AM
5 minute read
Our first runner-up is a team at Cooley led by Travis LeBlanc and Dee Bansal that on Nov. 9 secured a consent order with the Federal Trade Commission on behalf of client Zoom Communications Inc. The deal settles FTC claims that Zoom misrepresented its security features, including claims that its videoconferencing platform implemented end-to-end encryption when it hadn't, and requires the company to create an annual report of its internal and external security risks. As part of the deal, Zoom paid no monetary fine or penalty. The Cooley team also included David Mills, Scott Dailard, David Navetta, Nick Flath, Chip Harrison, David Houska, Jina John, Matt Johnson, Kaitland Kennelly, Joseph Mornin, Natalie Pike, and Tania Soris.
In a victory made extra sweet given that it landed just before Veterans Day, a Paul Hastings team led by Stephen Kinnaird working pro bono alongside the National Veterans Legal Services Program secured retroactive disability and death benefits for a class of so-called "Blue Water" Navy veterans of the Vietnam War and their survivors. Blue Water veterans who served on ships in the territorial seas of Vietnam rather than inland waterways had previously been excluded from a deal struck to compensate those exposed to Agent Orange during the war. On Nov. 5, U.S. District Judge William Alsup in San Francisco found that Blue Water veterans are members of the previously certified class and that the VA had been improperly denying them benefits. The firm estimates the ruling could affect between 2,000 and 15,000 veterans and their survivors, and could result in an average of $28,000 in benefits for each. The Paul Hastings team also included partner Sean Unger, senior associate Sarah Besnoff, and associate Alex Schulman.
Also landing a runner-up spot this week are litigators at Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati who made it more difficult for pharmaceutical companies to drag generic drug makers into brand-friendly venues such as Delaware and New Jersey. The Federal Circuit on Nov. 5 sided with Wilson Sonsini's client Mylan finding that under the U.S. Supreme Court's 2017 TC Heartland ruling branded pharmaceutical companies can only bring Hatch-Waxman Act litigation where a generic drug maker submits its Abbreviated New Drug Application—typically either that company's corporate headquarters or the FDA offices in Maryland. Wilson Sonsini's Steffen Johnson, T.O. Kong, Wendy Devine, Kristina Hanson, Adam Burrowbridge, and Ed Powell represent Mylan in the matter.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHelping Lawyers Move Away from ‘Grinding’ and Toward a ‘Flow’
Why Litigation Demand Might Break Firms’ Boom-and-Bust Cycle
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250