Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and a Shout Out
This week's lineup includes one runner-up who can claim the rare feat of having been edged out by himself.
June 11, 2021 at 07:25 AM
3 minute read
Bill Burck, Stephen Hauss, and Daniel Koffman of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan land in the top runner-up spot this week for getting a long-running False Claims Act suit against insurance giant AIG knocked out with prejudice by a state trial court in New York. Former AIG employee Alex Grabcheski alleged that the company had evaded more than $50 million in state taxes for decades. MetLife previously settled similar claims related to a former AIG subsidiary that it has since acquired. But AIG's lawyers at Quinn convinced Judge John Kelley of New York Supreme Court this week that the conduct that MetLife conceded in 2014 was unlawful insurance activity actually does "not constitute the conducting of an insurance business under the [state's] Insurance Law or the Tax Law." (Extra kudos to Burck for being the rare litigator who can claim to have been bested by himself. Read our back-and-forth with him and colleague AJ Merton in this week's winner Q&A below.)
Also landing a runner-up spot is a team at Shook, Hardy & Bacon led by Hildy Sastre and Jennifer Hill. The Shook team won summary judgement for GlaxoSmithKline ending six years of multi-district litigation considering whether the nausea medication Zofran caused birth defects in 400 women using the drug during pregnancy. U.S. Chief District Judge F. Dennis Saylor IV in Boston found last week that all of the plaintiffs' state law claims of failure to provide an adequate warning label were preempted by federal law.
One last runner-up spot goes to a team at Vinson & Elkins who helped Dallas plaintiffs lawyer Frank Branson get a personal injury judgment of more $200 million upheld in a products-liability case against Toyota Motor Corp. The opinion from the Dallas Court of Appeals upholds a trial win for the Reavis family, whose two young children suffered severe, permanent brain damage in a collision involving a Toyota-made Lexus vehicle. A Dallas jury previously found vehicle design defective and Toyota grossly negligent. V&E partner Marie Yeates argued the case before the Court of Appeals in April 2020. The V&E team, led by Harry Reasoner, also included Tom Leatherbury, Mike Heidler, George Gerachis, Max Etchemendy, Ben Moss, Parker Cragg, Ethan Nutter, and Bryan Gividen.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrying a Case for Abu Ghraib Detainees Two Decades After Abuse
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Cars Reach Record Fuel Economy but Largely Fail to Meet Biden's EPA Standard, Agency Says
- 2How Cybercriminals Exploit Law Firms’ Holiday Vulnerabilities
- 3DOJ Asks 5th Circuit to Publish Opinion Upholding Gun Ban for Felon
- 4GEO Group Sued Over 2 Wrongful Deaths
- 5Revenue Up at Homegrown Texas Firms Through Q3, Though Demand Slipped Slightly
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250