Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout Outs
Goodwin Procter scored a complete defense verdict for LED display company Absen in patent litigation brought by Ultravision.
June 18, 2021 at 07:25 AM
7 minute read
Our first runner-up this week is a team at Goodwin Procter that scored a complete defense verdict for LED display company Absen in patent litigation brought by Ultravision. After three-and-a-half days of testimony, an eight-person jury in Marshall, Texas, last week found not only that Absen didn't infringe any of the three asserted patent claims, but also that all three were invalid. The Goodwin trial team representing Absen included PJ McCarthy, Srikanth Reddy, Naomi Birbach, Louis Lobel, Kevin Martin, and Kelly Grosshuesch, who were supported by Lucas Dahlin and Madeline DiLascia.
Jenner & Block partners Lee Wolosky and Andrew Lichtman get a runner-up nod for fending off an injunction bid by plaintiffs who claimed that the facial recognition technology used by Clearview AI Inc. violates the Illinois Biometrics Privacy Act. U.S. District Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman in Chicago this week agreed with arguments put forward by the Jenner lawyers and co-counsel Floyd Abrams and Joel Kurtzberg at Cahill Gordon & Reindel that the plaintiffs failed to establish they were likely to suffer irreparable harm after Clearview made a number of changes to its business practices relating to the Illinois class.
A separate Jenner & Block team also nab runners-up honors for representing SoundExchange, the non-profit that collects and distributes digital performance royalties for recording artists and copyright owners, as well as record companies, artist unions, and the American Association of Independent Music in proceedings before the U.S. Copyright Royalty Board. Jenner partners Previn Warren, Emily Chapuis, Alex Trepp, Steve Englund, and of counsel Dave Handzo led a team that last week got a decision from the CRB setting a significant rate increase from webcasters including Pandora, Sirius XM, and Google for 2021 through 2025—an 8% rate bump for subscription services, 17% bump for ad-supported services, and 100% rate increase for most non-commercial services.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrying a Case for Abu Ghraib Detainees Two Decades After Abuse
Should It Be Left to the Plaintiffs Bar to Enforce Judicial Privacy Laws?
7 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Congress and Courts are Considering Litigation Financing: Is Disclosure Imminent?
- 2Bar Report — Nov. 25, 2024
- 3People in the News—Nov. 25, 2024—Eckert Seamans, Klehr Harrison
- 4How We Made Practice Group Chair: 'One of the Most Important Skills Is Being a Good Listener,' Say Timothy Kincaid and Brad Vaiana of Winston & Strawn
- 5Avoiding Inadvertent Conflict Issues With Constituents When Representing Organizational Clients
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250