Litigators of the Week Runners-Up and Shout outs
Roberto Finzi and Richard Tarlowe of Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison and Justin Weddle of Weddle Law secured a plea deal for their clients, Anilesh "Neil" Ahuja, the founder and former CEO of hedge fund Premium Point Investments and former trader PPI trader Jeremy Shor that resulted in no prison time.
April 29, 2022 at 07:25 AM
7 minute read
Our first Litigator of the Week runners-up this week are Roberto Finzi and Richard Tarlowe of Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison and Justin Weddle of Weddle Law. They achieved a remarkable turnaround for their clients, Anilesh "Neil" Ahuja, the founder and former CEO of hedge fund Premium Point Investments and former trader PPI trader Jeremy Shor. Ahuja and Shor faced sentences of 50 months and 40 months in prison respectively after a federal jury convicted them on securities fraud charges following a six-week trial in 2019. But after the defense team used a FOIA request to surface evidence that a federal prosecutor suggested revisions to the plea allocutions of government cooperators in their case, U.S. District Judge Katherine Polk Failla in Manhattan granted the defense lawyers' request for a new trial late last year. Last week the judge signed off on a rare 11(c)(1)(C) plea agreement binding her to time-served sentences agreed upon by the parties. With the initial surrender dates for the defendants pushed back due to the pandemic, the outcome means that neither served any prison time. John Del Monaco of Kirkland & Ellis served as co-counsel for Ahuja alongside the Paul Weiss lawyers. Shor was also represented by Julia Catania of Weddle Law.
Another runners-up spot goes to a team at Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher led by Jason Mendro, Adam Offenhartz and Laura O'Boyle. The Fourth Circuit last week upheld the dismissal of a securities class action related to a major data breach targeting servers owned by their client Marriott International. The court noted that SEC guidance advises companies to avoid making detailed disclosures that ultimately could compromise cybersecurity efforts. "Marriott certainly could have provided more information to the public about its experience with or vulnerability to cyberattacks, but the federal securities laws did not require it to do so," wrote Judge Toby Heytens for the unanimous Fourth Circuit panel. Mendro argued the appeal on behalf of the company and its executives. The Gibson Dunn team on the matter also includes Jeffrey Rosenberg, Andrei Malikov and Erica Sollazzo Payne.
Runners-up honors go to a team at Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr that got an early win for Intuit in one of the first major enforcement actions brought by the Federal Trade Commission under Chair Lina Khan. The FTC was seeking an injunction barring Intuit from advertising its TurboTax Free Edition as "free free free free" with only a discreet disclaimer that the service is "for simple returns only." Senior U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer in San Francisco turned back the injunction bid last week noting that year's tax season passed and Intuit had already taken down three of the "most plausibly deceptive advertisements" — three videos repeating the word "free" a dozen or more times over 30 seconds before a brief disclaimer. Breyer also noted the FTC has an administrative proceeding against Intuit involving the matter set for a hearing before an ALJ in September. The Wilmer team representing Intuit was led by Jonathan Paikin and David Gringer, and included partners Howard Shapiro, Sonal Mehta, Jennifer Milici, Daniel Volchok and Seth Waxman, who argued the TRO motion.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLitigators of the Week: After a 74-Day Trial, Shook Fends Off Claims From Artist’s Heirs Against UMB Bank
An ‘Indiana Jones Moment’: Mayer Brown’s John Nadolenco and Kelly Kramer on the 10-Year Legal Saga of the Bahia Emerald
Why the Founders of IP Boutique Fisch Sigler Are Stepping Away From the Law and Starting an AI Venture
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250