Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout Outs
A Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton team takes home the top runners-up spot for their trial win for monoline insurer Assured Guaranty in a showdown with Lehman Brothers International Europe over the valuation of certain credit default swaps.
March 10, 2023 at 07:25 AM
8 minute read
Quick TakesA Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton team led by partners Lev Dassin, Roger Cooper, Rishi Zutshi and Lina Bensman takes home the top runners-up spot for their trial win for monoline insurer Assured Guaranty. During a five-week bench trial in the fall of 2021, the Cleary team squared off with lawyers for Lehman Brothers International Europe, which was seeking $485 million dollars related to the valuation of certain credit default swaps during the financial crisis in July 2009. "At that point in time, the markets were so disrupted that accurate market prices were non-existent," wrote New York Supreme Court Justice Melissa Crane. The judge this week sided completely with Assured Guaranty, finding its valuation "was commercially reasonable and in good faith" and that LBIE's proposed valuation "relied entirely on market prices its experts constructed for this litigation." The Cleary team also included associates Daniel Montgomery, Tabitha Cohen, Drew Kramer, Jonathan Jaroslawicz, Tom Mintz, Xu Yang, Laura Harder and John Mucciolo, senior discovery attorney Jennifer Levy, and staff attorney Ashley Graham.
Runners-up honors also go to J. Scott McBride, Nevin Gewertz, Rebecca Horwitz and Meg Fasulo of Bartlit Beck for defending Gilead's blockbuster hepatitis C drugs from patent infringement claims. The Federal Circuit this week upheld the firm's win alongside co-counsel at Venable in an inter partes review at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board for Gilead, invalidating all claims of a patent asserted by the Regents of the University of Minnesota against Gilead's hepatitis C treatments containing sofosbuvir. Federal Circuit Judge Alan Lourie wrote that the university's patent, which provided multiple paths to create potential compounds, did not provide "a written description of what might have been described if each of the optional steps had been set forth as the only option." The judge continued: "This argument calls to mind what Yogi Berra, the Yankee catcher, was reported to have said: 'when one comes to a fork in the road, take it.'"
An appellate team led by Nicole Saharsky of Mayer Brown and Brian Gilpin of Godfrey & Kahn lands a runner-up spot for scoring a win for U.S. cheesemakers in a trademark scrum over the use of the name "gruyere." The Fourth Circuit this week affirmed a lower court decision turning back a legal challenge from consortiums of cheesemakers from Switzerland and France who argued the gruyere name should be considered a certification mark applicable only to cheese produced in the Gruyère region. But Chief Judge Roger Gregory wrote for the unanimous panel: "The consortiums cannot overcome what the record makes clear: cheese consumers in the United States understand 'Gruyere' to refer to a type of cheese, which renders the term generic." The team also included Minh Nguyen-Dang of Mayer Brown as well as Zachary Willenbrink and Jennifer Gregor of Godfrey & Kahn.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSome Election Day Shout-Outs to Litigators Working Pro Bono on Voting Rights
Law Firms Mentioned
- Bartlit Beck Herman
- Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton
- Davis Polk & Wardwell
- Foley & Lardner
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher
- Godfrey & Kahn, S.C.
- Latham & Watkins
- Mayer Brown
- Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Warton & Garrison
- Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan
- Rivkin Radler
- Shutts & Bowen
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
- Susman Godfrey
- Venable
- Wigdor LLP
- Winston & Strawn LLP
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250