2024 Marked Growth On Top of Growth for Law Firm Litigation Practices. Is a Cooldown in the Offing for 2025?
According to data released by Thomson Reuters last week, litigation demand grew 3.3% in 2024 after seeing 2.8% growth in 2023.
January 13, 2025 at 08:30 AM
4 minute read
Large law firms saw a “historic” surge in demand last year as a bounce back in transactional work helped push law firm profits to new heights. But litigation, which has seen steady growth post-pandemic, was once again a key driver in law firms’ overall success.
That’s according to the “2025 Report on the State of the U.S. Legal Market” published last week by the Thomson Reuters Institute and the Center on Ethics and the Legal Profession at Georgetown Law. Here’s how the report’s authors encapsulated the state of play:
The report draws data from 183 U.S.-based law firms, including 51 Am Law 100 firms, 52 in the Second Hundred and 80 midsize firms that fall outside the Am Law 200. Among that cohort, litigation demand grew 3.3% in 2024 after seeing 2.8% growth in 2023—a year when litigation accounted for 27% of all demand at the surveyed firms.To be sure, law firm demand has seen a historic growth surge, with the average law firm experiencing growth in demand of 2.6% in 2024. For the large law firm industry, this is incredibly atypical, as firms in that category averaged 0.1% annual demand growth from 2007 to 2023. The level of demand growth seen in 2024 is comparable only to the pandemic-era bounce back from historic lows, when law firm demand grew 3.7% on average in 2021. This growth was, however, measuring from the collapse of demand that defined 2020, in contrast to 2024 which is measuring on top of 2023’s already strong growth. In other words, the 2024 demand performance is far stronger and more real than 2021’s bounce back.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLitigators of the Week: A Knockout Blow to Latest FCC Net Neutrality Rules After ‘Loper Bright’
Litigators of the (Past) Week: Defending Against a $290M Claim and Scoring a $116M Win in Drug Patent Fight
Trending Stories
- 1Newsmakers: Robert Collins, Barron Wallace Elected to Bracewell’s Management Committee
- 2Navigating the Shifting Sands of E-Discovery and Information Governance in 2025
- 3A Plan for Coordinating State Action on Environmental Protection as the Federal Government Rolls Back National Efforts
- 4Alston & Bird, Eversheds Sutherland Ranked Among Top Firms Globally for M&A Deals in 2024
- 5Sheppard Mullin Expands in Dallas With 6-Lawyer White Collar Team From Bradley
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250