'The Most Peculiar Federal Court in the Country' Comes to Berkeley Law
Focusing an Economic Lens On the Decrease In Federal Civil Jury Trials
What to Watch For in the Upcoming SCOTUS Term
Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout-Outs
Law Firms Mobilize To Respond to Anti-DEI Backlash
How Senior Litigators Are Dealing With the 'Biden Effect'
New Revenue Streams: Getting the right skills in place is essential
AI and Protecting Your IP Strategy
Litigating Pesticide Bans and Restrictions for Defendants
Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout-Outs
Even With New Business Courts, Texas Is a Long Way from Taking Delaware's Corporate Law Mantle
Davis Polk and Legal Aid Society Team to Knock 15 Years Off Sex-Trafficking Survivor's Sentence
'Clear the Runway': Bill Lee's Longtime Focus on Succession Planning
Litigators of the Week: The Eighth Circuit Knocks Out a $564M Verdict Against BMO in Ponzi Case
Litigator of the Week Runners-Up
Getting Ahead of Unfair Criticism of Judges
Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
Three Steps for Building Great Relationships with In-House Counsel
Travis Lenkner Returns to Burford Capital With an Eye on Future Growth Opportunities
Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout-Outs
Meet the Judge Heading Philadelphia's Mass Torts Program
NITA Gears Up For Fourth 'Women In Trial' Program in Chicago
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Trending Stories
Data-driven reporting using ALM's proprietary resources
Go To Legal CompassIdentify Firms Making Gender Diversity Among Senior Leadership a Priority