From The Am Law Litigation Daily
Joshua Raskin, a partner at Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann, told ABC News back in 2008 that in his entire career he’d “never seen a more clear-cut case of patent infringement” than what Nikon Corp. allegedly did to his client, University of Illinois professor Kanti Jain. Manhattan federal district court judge Alvin Hellerstein clearly doesn’t agree. In a brief order issued on Tuesday April 3, Judge Hellerstein invalidated patents relating to LCD technology that Jain’s company, Anvik Corp., has been asserting against Nikon for close to seven years. Siding with Nikon’s lawyers at Morrison & Foerster, Hellerstein ruled that Jain undermined his own case during a deposition.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
