AN JOSE — As their latest patent trial drew to a close Tuesday, lawyers for Apple and Samsung took a stab at answering a question that is top of mind for observers: Why are they still going at it?
Delivering Apple Inc.’s closing argument, Morrison & Foerster partner Harold McElhinny stressed that Samsung reaps a handsome profit from sales of infringing phones. A modest damages award would do nothing to deter the infringement, he said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
