Navigating his way through racial politics, education policy and U.S. Supreme Court precedent, Latham & Watkins partner Gregory Garre won a ruling this week that preserves student affirmative action at the University of Texas at Austin. There could be a counterintuitive lesson in UT Austin’s victory: To advance a liberal cause, it may help to have a lawyer with conservative bona fides.
In a 2-1 ruling issued on Tuesday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ruled that UT didn’t violate the Fourteenth Amendment by making race a factor in its admissions process. Siding with Garre, the majority held that UT Austin’s approach—accepting all students in the top 10 percent of their high school class and then including race in a quota-free assessment of remaining applicants—was “necessary” for UT Austin to achieve a diverse student body.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
