When it comes to fighting the infamous patent troll MPHJ Technology Investments LLC, Nebraska attorney general Jon Bruning must envy his counterpart in Vermont. Just days after Vermont AG William Sorrell cleared a hurdle in his state’s consumer protection lawsuit against MPHJ, a judge in Nebraska has rejected a similar effort by Bruning’s office and awarded MPHJ attorney fees for violations of its constitutional rights.

In a ruling issued on Tuesday, U.S. District Judge Joseph Bataillon in Omaha ruled that Nebraska’s crackdown on MPHJ’s patent enforcement efforts interfered with the company’s free speech rights and right to select its counsel. The judge also enjoined the state from further investigating MPHJ unless it can make threshold showing that the company is acting in bad faith. Finally, Bataillon ruled that MPHJ is entitled to recover an as-yet-undetermined amount of attorney fees from the state.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]