The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit made it clear that it didn’t appreciate the tactics of Cox Communications Inc. and its lawyers in an antitrust class action against the cable television giant. On Wednesday the court held that the company couldn’t force a group of cable subscribers to arbitrate their claims because it waited too long to raise this arbitration argument.
Judge Carlos Lucero, writing for a unanimous panel, said that Cox’s belated attempt to move the bulk of the class claims to arbitration—after the court had already granted class certifcation—was an affront to the integrity of the judical process. “Nothing in the [Federal Arbitration Act] requires a district court to idly stand by while a party misleads that court through its material omissions and delays and needlessly extends the litigation process through a willful attempt to play ‘hide the ball,’” he wrote.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]