Georgia Jury Broadsides Casino Ship for $2.2M Verdict in Patron's Fall
Lawyers for the owner of the Emerald Princess II were denied summary judgment on their argument that a one-year statute of limitations printed on the plaintiff's boarding pass shielded them from liability.
January 11, 2018 at 03:15 PM
6 minute read
A Glynn County jury slammed the operator of a coastal Georgia casino ship with a more than $2.2 million verdict after a trial involving a man who fell through an open hatch.
After the accident, Robert Lowie and his wife were repeatedly assured by the Emerald Princess II's owner and insurer that he did not need to file a legal claim—assurances a judge ruled were made in order to run out the clock on a one-year statute of limitations printed on the back of a boarding pass.
Lowie, then a 66-year-old retiree, fell 10 feet through a hatch on the Emerald Princess II in late 2014, injuring his head and fracturing his spine.
According to Lowie's attorney Carl Varnedoe, Lowie and his wife relied on assurances from the CEO of the ship's owner and its insurance adjuster that they would cover his medical bills and pay for pain and suffering. Instead, after a year elapsed, the cruise line's insurer claimed the boarding pass barred any claims related to the accident.
“The insurer hired an independent claims adjuster who came down here, visited them in their home, made all these promises—in our opinion just baiting them, stringing them along until the hammer dropped,” said Varnedoe, who handled the case with colleague Billy Jones of Hinesville's Jones, Osteen & Jones.
Evidence revealed a “well-documented plan to allow the statute to run, then let them know the jig was up,” Varnedoe said.
A defense motion for summary judgment was denied when the judge ruled that Lowie and his wife proved “clearly, satisfactorily, and convincingly” that they relied on repeated representations “to their detriment” that they didn't need to hire a lawyer or file a lawsuit.
The defendant, Golden Isles Cruise Lines, was represented by Todd LaDouceur and Tony Jones of Galloway, Johnson, Tompkins, Burr & Smith in Atlanta. They did not respond to requests for comment.
The Daily Report was unable to reach the claims adjuster, Missouri attorney and maritime law specialist Stuart Platt, on Thursday.
The Emerald Princess II is a 200-foot, four-deck oceangoing ship that offers excursions in international waters, where customers can play poker, blackjack, craps, slot machines and other games.
Lowie, whom Varnedoe said sailed on the ship many times and was a “VIP member,” boarded on an afternoon in December 2014. He was walking on the first deck when he fell through a hatch a crew member left open and had placed chairs around.
Lowie “raked his head along the steel ladder” as he fell, suffering a brain bleed and two compression fractures to his spine that required three surgeries.
According to the plaintiffs' portion of pretrial order, claims adjuster Stuart Platt contacted Lowie dozens of times over the following year to discuss his injuries. Golden Isles' CEO Louis Dyer phoned Lowie and his wife at least 70 times and visited personally on several occasions during that time.
Platt, who Varnedoe said was hired by Allianz Insurance to handle the claim, “repeatedly assured” the couple that all of Lowie's medical bills would be paid, along with compensation for his pain and suffering, “and that there would be no need for plaintiffs to hire an attorney.”
Dyer made similar assurances, telling the couple that, “if they ever need anything from him, all [they] had to do was call.”
Over that year, Platt and Dyer gave the Lowie's more than $2,200 for prescriptions and out-of-pocket expenses.
According to the summary judgment order, in October 2015 Platt sent an email to Allianz and the cruise line saying the boarding pass language was “there in bold print. I think it's enforceable which means if Lowie does not file suit within one year, he is barred. I think we stay put until a year expires, then have a heart to heart with them.”
On the one-year anniversary of Lowie's accident, Platt called to wish them a Merry Christmas and see whether they had sent him any additional paperwork.
The next month he called Tina Lowie with some “bad news.”
According to her deposition, Platt said “well, I just found out, a few days ago, about the back of the boarding pass that there was a one-year statute of limitations.”
Platt said that, if Lowies would provide a letter for Medicare, the insurer may be willing to pay that agency and they “could probably get” $20,000 to $30,000 to settle the claim.
In February 2016, Platt sent his final invoice to Golden Isles and Allianz, which decided to deny the claim. His email noted, “I'm glad I was right about the validity of the statute on the ticket and it's [sic] enforceability, and now everyone is happy, except the Lowies.”
The Lowies sued in Glynn County Superior Court the next month. The lawsuit initially included a loss of consortium claim, but Varnedoe said maritime law bars such claims.
In August, Judge Anthony Harrison denied summary judgment on the defense claim that the boarding pass language barred the action. He issued a certificate of immediate review, but the Georgia Court of Appeals declined to hear Golden Isles' appeal.
Varnedoe said the last defense offer to settle the case before trial was for $425,000.
During a two-day trial, Varnedoe said the only expert testimony was by Lowies' Savannah neurosurgeon, James Lindley.
Lowie's medical bills totaled more than $236,000.
He said the defense relied heavily on evidence that Lowie had undergone an unrelated back surgery some years before and that his injuries were the result of a pre-existing condition.
The defense also argued comparative negligence, asserting that Lowie's injuries were largely of his own making. The defense portion of the pretrial order said the hatch was an “open and obvious” condition readily apparent to an observer.
The two-day trial wrapped up Tuesday afternoon, and the jury took about an hour and a half to award $2,236,850 in damages, with no liability apportioned to Lowie.
The award was “exactly what we asked for” in closing statements, Varnedoe said. He did not speak to any jurors afterward.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Idiosyncratic Realities': Appeals Court Leaves Medical Damages for Cruise Injuries to Juries
4 minute readGeorgia Jury Broadsides Casino Ship for $2.2M Verdict in Patron's Fall
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 2Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 3Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 4X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
- 5Monsanto Wins Latest Philadelphia Roundup Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250