Mass Torts Bar 'All-Star' Team Emerges to Lead Opioid MDL
A group of more than 20 lawyers who would be on many observers' list of the “best and the brightest” of the mass torts bar filed a motion on Wednesday to be appointed lead counsel in the national opioid multidistrict litigation.
December 20, 2017 at 06:34 PM
4 minute read
Photo Credit: Steve Heap/Shutterstock.com.
A group of more than 20 lawyers who would be on many observers' list of the “best and the brightest” of the mass torts bar filed a motion on Wednesday to be appointed lead counsel in the national opioid multidistrict litigation.
Plaintiffs lawyers decided on a leadership team following a unanimous voice vote at a meeting on Monday at the Hilton Cleveland Downtown Hotel. According to Wednesday's motion, the team would be led by New York attorney Paul Hanly of Simmons Hanly Conroy, Joe Rice of Motley Rice and Paul Farrell of West Virginia's Greene, Ketchum, Farrell, Bailey & Tweel, who is lead counsel in more than 100 of the 180 cases in the MDL before U.S. District Judge Dan Polster of the Northern District of Ohio. Polster had ordered plaintiffs lawyers to file motions for lead counsel by Dec. 20. No other motions were filed by the end of Wednesday, and responses are due on Thursday.
“All of the lawyers on the proposed slate are very experienced in either complex litigation or drug litigation or MDL proceedings,” Hanly said. Rice led the negotiations over the $246 billion tobacco settlement, as well as deals worth billions of dollars involving the BP oil spill in 2010 and the Volkswagen diesel emissions settlement. Farrell is founding co-chairman of the American Association for Justice's opioids section litigation group along with Baron & Budd's Burton LeBlanc, who is one of 15 lawyers on a proposed executive committee submitted in the motion.
Other members of the proposed executive committee include:
• Elizabeth Cabraser, whose firm, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, announced on Wednesday that the city of Nashville had retained the San Francisco firm to pursue an opioid lawsuit.
• Chris Seeger, founding partner of New York's Seeger Weiss.
• W. Mark Lanier of The Lanier Law Firm in Houston.
• Ellen Relkin of New York's Weitz & Luxenberg.
• Paul Geller of Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd in Boca Raton, Florida.
• Linda Singer, a Washington, D.C., partner at Motley Rice who has represented the city of Chicago and Santa Clara County, California, in some of the first opioid cases.
• Lynn Sarko of Keller Rohrback in Seattle.
• Russell Budd and Roland Tellis of Dallas-based Baron & Budd.
There also would be three co-liaison attorneys: Troy Rafferty of Levin, Papantonio, Thomas, Mitchell, Rafferty & Proctor in Pensacola, Florida; Steven Skikos of San Francisco's Skikos, Crawford, Skikos & Joseph; and Peter Weinberger, managing partner of Cleveland's Spangenberg Shibley & Liber.
The proposed names appear designed to bridge a divide in the plaintiffs bar over whether to pursue opioid cases in state courts or in an MDL, which many consider to be slower procedurally. Just this week, Harris County, Texas, announced that a group of Houston attorneys would pursue its opioid case in Texas state court.
“We're certainly hopeful that there will be cooperation,” said Hanly. “The endgame for all these entities is to recover some or all of the billions of dollars that collectively they're hemorrhaging.”
Several lawyers, including Hanly and Conroy, also have held leadership roles in an MDL over which Polster presided that involved gadolinium-based dyes used to treat diseased kidneys.
Hanly said about 175 lawyers showed up at Monday's meeting, which lasted two hours. In Wednesday's motion, lawyers asked Polster to extend until Jan. 9 a deadline to submit a proposed plaintiffs steering committee, which Hanly expected to comprise more than 20 additional attorneys. Hanly anticipated there could be some changes to the team going forward but didn't expect any additional motions for lead counsel to be filed.
“Everybody knows Joe Rice, everybody knows me and Jayne [Conroy] and Russell Budd. We all have great mutual respect for each other,” he said. “The reason there was not a single 'nay' vote is the slate we put together is the best and the brightest.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHolland & Knight, Akin, Crowell, Barnes and Day Pitney Add to DC Practices
3 minute read'There Is No Time to Waste': Matt Gaetz Withdraws From AG Nomination
3 minute readRead the Document: 'Google Must Divest Chrome,' DOJ Says, Proposing Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250