Government Shutdown? SCOTUS Is Unfazed.
A government-wide shutdown is a "non-event," retired Supreme Court clerk William Suter said in an interview Saturday. "The court marches on."
January 20, 2018 at 05:55 PM
3 minute read
The Lincoln Memorial was closed to visitors during the 2013 government shutdown. Photo: Diego M. Radzinschi / NLJ
No matter what happens next with the federal government shutdown, the U.S. Supreme Court will be open for business Monday, adhering to its tradition of ignoring the vicissitudes of the other branches of government.
For an institution that almost never shuts down—even when blizzards shutter other federal buildings—a government-wide shutdown is a “non-event,” retired Supreme Court clerk William Suter said in an interview Saturday. “The court marches on.”
Fortuitously, Monday is the last session of the high court until February 20, and it will consist only of opinion announcements, orders and the swearing-in of new members of the Supreme Court bar. There are no oral arguments. So the impact would be minimal even if the court were to join other entities in shutting down.
But the court almost never closes when other agencies do. The late Chief Justice William Rehnquist, who was a meteorologist in the military during World War II, shrugged at blizzards and refused to cancel arguments.
“It was eerie,” Suter said, remembering a session when the lawyers arguing a case, and almost no one else, made it to the court. “There were only about 20 people in the audience.”
Oral arguments were not delayed during the 2013 government shutdown. Former acting U.S. solicitor general Neal Katyal recalled earlier arguments on snowy days. “I think of the court the way I think of my elementary school in Chicago; it never shuts down.”
In a press release issued Saturday, the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts said the judiciary, using fees and other resources, had enough money to stay open until February 9. The Supreme Court, which has a budget separate from the rest of the federal courts, may draw on similar resources until the shutdown ends.
A court spokesperson confirmed the justices will convene Monday.
Also possibly lessening the impact of the shutdown on the Supreme Court is the fact the court last November began allowing lawyers to file briefs and other documents electronically.
Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. noted in his end-of-the-year annual report last month that federal courts are deemed by statute (28 U.S.C. 452) to be open at all times for filings and other official business.
“On fair weather days, it is easy to take that provision for granted,” Roberts wrote. Referring to recent natural disasters that affected court operations, Roberts added, “When disaster strikes, it can be honored only through the tireless efforts of judges, court employees, Administrative Office staff, and the many friends of the judiciary.”
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHolland & Knight, Akin, Crowell, Barnes and Day Pitney Add to DC Practices
3 minute read'There Is No Time to Waste': Matt Gaetz Withdraws From AG Nomination
3 minute readRead the Document: 'Google Must Divest Chrome,' DOJ Says, Proposing Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250