BNP Paribas Pleads to Antitrust Conspiracy, Agrees to $90M Fine
The plea is the sixth by a major bank as part of an ongoing DOJ investigation into antitrust and fraud crimes in the FX market.
January 26, 2018 at 04:14 PM
3 minute read
BNP Paribas in Milan, Italy.
BNP Paribas pleaded guilty to a single count violation of the Sherman Act and agreed to a $90 million criminal fine to settle an investigation into a foreign exchange price-fixing conspiracy involving central and eastern European, Middle Eastern and African currencies, the U.S. Department of Justice announced Friday.
“The Antitrust Division is committed to uncovering and prosecuting wrongdoing in all corners of the foreign currency exchange market, including this conspiracy affecting multiple emerging market currencies,” Assistant Attorney General Makan Delrahim said in a statement. “The division's investigation aims to root out and eradicate the manipulation that has plagued this industry.”
According to the DOJ, traders for the bank and unnamed co-conspirators attempted to suppress and eliminate competition by fixing prices of the affected currencies. Non-bona fide trades were entered into among the conspirators on an electronic FX trading platform, which were then either canceled or nullified by trades in the opposite direction in an attempt to conceal the actions from other FX participants.
From as early as late 2011 through at least 2013, the conspirators also coordinated price, size and timing of their bids and offers, federal prosecutors said, as well as agreeing to refrain from trading to help other co-conspirators with a need to buy or sell that was greater than the other participants, thus keeping prices beneficial to the favored trader.
The bank deal follows from two guilty pleas earlier in January by traders directly working in the affected currency markets. Jason Katz, a former BNP trader, pleaded guilty to price-fixing conspiracy charges in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York on Jan. 4. Eight days later, Christopher Cummins, a former trader with Citigroup, pleaded guilty to similar charges in the same court.
Federal prosecutors noted that BNP Paribas is now the sixth major bank to plead guilty as part of an ongoing investigation into antitrust and fraud crimes inside the foreign exchange market. In May 2015, Citicorp, JPMorgan Chase & Co., Barclays and RBS pleaded guilty to charges related to the investigation and collectively agreed to pay more than $2.5 billion in criminal fines. UBS would later plead guilty to manipulation of the London Interbank Offered Rate and other benchmark interest rates, and agree to a $203 million criminal penalty.
As part of the plea deal, prosecutors recommended no probation for the bank in light of the bank's compliance with the investigation and remediation efforts, as well as future promises of cooperation.
In a statement released on its website Friday, BNP stated it “deeply regrets the past misconduct,” calling it “a clear breach of the high standards on which it operates.”
“Conducting its business in a responsible and ethical manner is a cornerstone of BNP Paribas' values and the group will continue to make improvements to ensure that it delivers on its responsibilities to all its stakeholders,” the bank stated.
Allen & Overy partner David Esseks led the bank's legal representation in the matter.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMore Big Law Firms Rush to Match Associate Bonuses, While Some Offer Potential for Even More
Lululemon Faces Legal Fire Over Its DEI Program After Bias Complaints Surface
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250