Delco Jury Awards $40M in Birth Injury Paralysis
A Delaware County jury has awarded more than $40 million to the family of a 6-year-old who suffered a spinal injury during birth. According to attorneys representing the plaintiff, the award is the largest personal injury verdict from a Delaware County jury.
January 24, 2018 at 03:20 PM
4 minute read
A Delaware County jury has awarded more than $40 million to the family of a 6-year-old who suffered a spinal injury during birth. According to attorneys representing the plaintiff, the award is the largest personal injury verdict from a Delaware County jury.
The verdict was handed up Tuesday evening in Delaware County Court of Common Pleas Senior Judge Charles Burr's courtroom after more than two weeks of trial. The jury awarded $40.26 million, including $10 million for past and future pain and suffering, with the rest of the award going toward future economic damages, according to the plaintiffs' attorneys.
Attorneys Timothy Lawn and Stephen Raynes of Raynes McCarty represented plaintiff Grayson Charlton, who is paralyzed from her mid-chest down.
According to Lawn, the trial was hard-fought and there was significant expert testimony from both sides, but, he said, an overwhelming accumulation of evidence pointing toward a birth injury was what convinced the jury.
“I don't think it was one piece as much as the evidence overall, and that was my theme at closing,” he said. “With all of these medical facts in the case, you don't get this injury in utero. It has to be excessive traction at birth.”
He said the defendants did not make any offers in the litigation.
According to the plaintiffs' pretrial memo, Charlton's mother was admitted to Delaware County Memorial Hospital on March 2, 2011, for induction of labor. She was pregnant with twins, and both babies appeared to be healthy.
The memo said that, although Charlton's mother had been told the babies would be delivered via a cesarean section, Dr. Steven Troy, who had been the attending physician, performed the births vaginally. The memo also said that after Charlton's sister had been delivered, Charlton was in a footling breech position and should have been delivered by cesarean section.
The delivery, according to the memo, including Troy “grasping [Charlton's] body and pulling her” through her mother's cervix birth canal, but during that process a loud popping sound was heard throughout the room. The memo cited an incident report a nurse wrote that documented the sound.
The plaintiffs sued Troy and the hospital, claiming he used excessive force during the delivery.
Several experts, including obstetrician Dr. Benjamin Hamar, obstetrician Dr. Ronald Wapner and pediatric neuroradiologist Paul Caruso, opined that Charlton suffered a severe traumatic spinal injury as a result of Troy's care, according to the plaintiff's memo.
The memo also said Charlton will live the rest of her life in a wheelchair, in a diaper and will be unable to feed herself.
Life care planner Val Parisi opined, according to the memo, that Charlton will need lifelong physical and occupational therapy, personal assistance throughout her days, and regular visits with doctors. The plaintiffs' memo also said economist David Hopkins estimated Charlton's future medical care to be $29 million.
In his pretrial memo, Troy contended that his treatment was within the standard of care, and that the plaintiffs' causation arguments were speculative. Given the positioning of the fetuses, a vaginal delivery was well within the standard of care, Troy argued. The memo further said the mother had been told doctors would only perform a C-section if Charlton's sister's head was not in a down position.
Troy also noted that the pregnancy was determined early on to be a high-risk pregnancy, and that Charlton had been diagnosed in utero with intrauterine growth restriction. A review of the fetal heart rates also indicated she was tachycardic, his memo said.
Troy further contended that, although everyone in the room heard the popping sound, nobody knew what to attribute it to, and it did not occur at a time when he was administering traction on Charlton.
Post & Post attorney Benjamin Post represented defendant Troy, as well as Crozer-Keystone Health System and Health Access Network. Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin attorney Stephen Ryan represented Delaware County Memorial Hospital, which was found liable on a theory of ostensible agency.
Post and Ryan did not immediately return a call seeking comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJefferson Doctor Hit With $6.8M Verdict Over Death of 64-Year-Old Cancer Patient
3 minute readPhila. Judge Rules $12M Crash Verdict Was Backed by Evidence as Case Heads to Appeal
3 minute readPhila. Attorney Reflects on Client's $1M Win Against Officers' No-Knock Search Warrant
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250