Quinn Emanuel Defends Judge Alex Kozinski as Misconduct Claims Mount
Federal appeals judge Alex Kozinski has retained Susan Estrich and William Burck of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan to represent him as additional women step forward to accuse him of sexual misconduct.
December 15, 2017 at 09:09 PM
5 minute read
Susan Estrich of Quinn Emanuel listens to testimony from former Equifax CEO Richard Smith. Credit: Diego M. Radzinschi
Federal appeals judge Alex Kozinski has retained Susan Estrich and William Burck of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan to represent him as additional women step forward to accuse him of sexual misconduct.
The Washington Post reported Friday evening that nine women, in addition to six who lodged allegations against the longtime Ninth Circuit judge last week, accuse Kozinski of making inappropriate comments. Four of the women claim he touched them inappropriately.
Alex Kozinski. Credit: John Disney/ALMIn response to the latest allegations, Kozinski, in a statement read by Estrich to the Washington Post, said: “Many of the things that are being said about me are simply not true, but I deeply regret that my unusual sense of humor caused offense or made anyone uncomfortable.”
The latest allegations came on the heels of action by Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. on Friday in which he transferred a complaint initiated by Ninth Circuit Chief Judge Sidney Thomas to the Second Circuit. The Judicial Council of the Second Circuit will oversee the misconduct investigation.
Estrich and Burck are co-chairs of their firm's crisis law practice. Estrich also is a law and political science professor at the University of Southern California and a legal and political analyst for Fox News Channel.
In 2016, she represented former Fox New chairman Roger Ailes, now deceased, when he was accused of sexual harassment by a number of women who worked for him. Estrich recently appeared on Capitol Hill as a lawyer for former Equifax Inc. chairman Richard Smith, who resigned in the aftermath of the massive data breach at the company.
Estrich, a feminist legal scholar, is the author of several books, including Sex & Power, Real Rape, and The Case for Hillary Clinton. A Harvard Law School graduate, she is a former clerk to Justice John Paul Stevens.
William Burck, a former Kozinski clerk and former clerk to Justice Anthony Kennedy, is co-managing partner of the firm's Washington office and co-chair of the investigations, government enforcement and white-collar practice. He clerked for Kozinski in 1998-99 after graduating from Yale Law School.
A former assistant U.S. attorney for the southern district of New York, Burck also served as special counsel and deputy counsel to President George W. Bush from 2007 to 2009. He was named a “Trailblazer in White Collar” in 2016 by The National Law Journal.
Burck currently represents White House counsel Donald McGahn and former White House chief of staff Reince Priebus in Robert Mueller's investigation of Russia's interference in the presidential election.
The latest allegations against Kozinski include Christine O.C. Miller, a retired U.S. Court of Federal Claims judge, who said the judge grabbed and squeezed her breasts as they drove back from an event in Baltimore in the mid-1980s, after she declined to have sex with him.
Another woman said that when she was a student in 2016 at the University of Montana School of Law, Kozinski, apparently in an attempt to see her name tag during a reception, “very deliberately put his finger on the other side of my breast, and moved it, with some pressure” to the center.
The Second Circuit investigation of the allegations will be confidential, according to rules adopted by the Judicial Conference of the United States.
When final action has been taken on the complaint and it is no longer subject to review, all orders entered by the chief judge and judicial council, including any supporting memoranda and any dissenting opinions or separate statements by members of the judicial council, must be made public—with certain exceptions, according to the rules.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllContract Software Unicorn Ironclad Hires Former Pinterest Lawyer as GC
2 minute readSouthern California Law Firms Boast Industry-Leading Revenue, Demand Through Q3
Dog Gone It, Target: Provider of Retailer's Mascot Dog Sues Over Contract Cancellation
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250