Racing to Fix Security Flaws, Intel Hit With First Class Action
As the company scrambles to patch vulnerabilities that affect processors used widely throughout the computer industry, it faces at least one class action lawsuit and the prospect of more.
January 04, 2018 at 03:00 PM
3 minute read
Add this to the headaches facing Intel Corp. as reports roll in about the vulnerability of the company's computer chips: The company was hit with a class action lawsuit claiming it doesn't have a viable fix for defective x86-64x processors, and the proposed patches will degrade the performance of devices that use them.
The class action complaint filed Wednesday in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California by lawyers at Doyle APC in San Diego, the Law Office of James R. Hail in Chula Vista and Branstetter, Stranch & Jennings in Nashville, Tennessee, quotes heavily from a Jan 2. report from online tech publication The Register, which said “a fundamental design flaw in Intel's processor chip” left the industry scrambling to “defang the chip-level security bug.” The vulnerability could leave users' sensitive data, such as passwords and log-in keys, open to hacking.
The Register reported that updates to both Linux and Windows operating systems addressing the issue are expected to slowdown machines with Intel chips by 5 percent to 30 percent, depending on the task and processor model.
“In essence, Intel x86-64x CPU owners are left with the unappealing choice of either purchasing a new processor or computer containing a CPU that does not contain the defect, or continuing to use a computer with massive security vulnerabilities or one with significant performance degradation,” the complaint said.
Intel publicly acknowledged the issue Wednesday and said it's working with other chipmakers, including AMD and ARM Holdings, as well as operating system makers, “to develop an industrywide approach to resolve this issue promptly and constructively.” Intel, however, claimed the performance impacts “should not be significant and will be mitigated with time.” Company representatives didn't respond to an email message seeking comment on the lawsuit.
Chris Cantrell of Doyle APC, one of the lawyers who filed suit Wednesday, said he expects many more suits to be filed on behalf of consumers and businesses against Intel in the coming days and weeks—especially since cloud computing services hosted by Amazon, Google and Microsoft are expected to be impacted by the security fixes.
“I fully expect there to be additional filings and that this will go the usual route of multidistrict litigation,” Cantrell said. “Just the sheer number of devices that we're talking about … Most of the desktop and laptop computers in use today.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBuchalter Hires Longtime Sheppard Mullin Real Estate Partner as Practice Chair
Reality TV Couple and Pacific Palisades Neighbors Sue City of Los Angeles Over Loss of Homes to Fire
3 minute readIn Resolved Lawsuit, Jim Walden Alleged 'Retaliatory' Silencing by X of His Personal Social Media Account
Trending Stories
- 1No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 2Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 3Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
- 4Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
- 5Freshfields Hires Ex-SEC Corporate Finance Director in Silicon Valley
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250