Apple Faces Spreading Legal Woes Over Slowed iPhones
In France, the technology giant faces a preliminary criminal probe alleging “programmed obsolescence” of older iPhones, while plaintiffs are pushing for MDL treatment of at least 30 civil suits in the U.S.
January 09, 2018 at 06:50 PM
3 minute read
Apple Inc. faces transcontinental legal woes over software changes which slowed the performance of certain iPhone models.
According to Bloomberg, the Cupertino-based technology giant faces a preliminary French criminal probe for “programmed obsolescence” and “deceit” after consumer groups accused the company of deliberately shortening the life span of older iPhones.
Back stateside, plaintiffs lawyers have asked the Judicial Panel for Multidistrict Litigation to coordinate at least 30 federal lawsuits targeting the company with a variety of consumer protection, fraud and trespass claims related to the performance woes of older smartphone models.
The moves come as Apple officials released a rare public apology on Dec. 28 over how the company handled performance issues for iPhones with older batteries and how it communicated that process to customers. The company announced it will drop the price of replacing the battery for out-of-warranty iPhones by $50 to $29 and updated its software to alert consumers whether battery issues were affecting their phones' performance.
But Apple's mea culpa came after online chatter about performance issues in older iPhones had reached a fever pitch. Conversations on Reddit sparked a Dec. 18 post from the founder of the company behind Geekbench processor testing software—Primate Labs founder John Poole—who found iPhones with older batteries exhibited “lower-than-expected” performance in tests.
Poole concluded that Apple's fix to the sudden shutdown problem in older phones would “cause users to think, 'My phone is slow so I should replace it,' not, 'My phone is slow so I should replace its battery.'”
In the wake of Poole's post, Apple officials initially told tech website TechCrunch the company installed “a feature” on older iPhone models with batteries that are unable to meet the peak electrical demands needed to operate in cold conditions or when phone batteries have a low charge. The company said its aim was to “smooth out the instantaneous peaks only when needed” to avoid unexpected shutdowns of the older phones.
In the Dec. 28 statement, Apple said that the company now believes “the continued chemical aging of the batteries in older iPhone 6 and iPhone 6s devices” contributes to user problems.
Reached by phone Monday, James Vlahakis of Sulaiman Law Group, lead counsel in one of the initial cases targeting Apple on the issue, said that the company's delayed—and changing—disclosure speaks volumes.
“Even if they are doing it to help people, they should have” said so, Vlahakis said. “What did you have to hide if you were doing something good?”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJustices Seek Solicitor General's Views on Music Industry's Copyright Case Against ISP
Judge to Hear Arguments on Whether Google's Advertising Tech Constitutes a Monopoly
3 minute readSEC Targets Rising Crypto Financier in $115 Million Securities Fraud
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Daniel Habib to Serve as Next Attorney-in-Charge of NY Federal Defender Appeals Unit
- 2Protecting Attorney-Client Privilege in the Modern Age of Communications
- 3High-Profile Sidley M&A Partner Heads to Covington
- 4Stars and Gripes: Firms Need a 'Superstar Culture' to Crack the U.S. Market
- 5BCLP Exploring Merger Prospects as Profitability Lags, Partnership Shrinks
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250