Some firms were up, some firms were down and some firms saw little to no change between 2014 and 2013 financial results. It all boils down to a 👍, 👎 or ✋.

So far this year, The National Law Journal has covered several financial announcements from D.C.'s largest firms. Why not corral them and a few other firms of interest into one helpful post?

For the purposes of this blog, we used the thumbs up icon to signify growth of approximately 3 percent or more from 2013 to 2014. The thumbs down indicates more than a 3 percent decrease. The flat-hand symbol means the firm's one-year change was about stagnant.

We intend to offer a snapshot of the choices last year made by D.C.'s leading firms—from whether they saw a need to shrink, pump up profits or found a windfall of work in revenue per lawyer.

A few firms embarked upon an internal restructuring, including Dickstein Shapiro; Steptoe & Johnson LLP; and Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, while others enjoyed the riches of the postrecession economy and an active regulatory government.

Onward now as we “memo with pencil,” “banknote with dollar sign,” “smiley face.”

|

Covington & Burling

Story: Covington Boasts 16 Percent PPP Growth But Thinks Long-Term

|
  • Revenue per lawyer: 👍
  • Profits per partner: 👍
  • Total lawyers: ✋

“By no means do I think that means the job is done.” —chairman Timothy Hester

|

Hogan Lovells

Story: Hogan Lovells' Gross Revenue Grows by 3.6%

|
  • RPL: ✋
  • PPP: ✋
  • Total lawyers: ✋

“What I really care about most is how we're getting there.” —CEO Stephen Immelt