What Clinton's Email Troubles Can Teach Employers
Like the former secretary of state, too many businesses commingle work and personal traffic.
April 13, 2015 at 05:06 PM
6 minute read
One of the most striking aspects of the Hillary Clinton email controversy is how last century it all is. The secretary's technology troubles stem not from her use of a hot new app or the latest i-whatever device, but from email, that oldest of old-school platforms. Nevertheless, employers (and their lawyers) in both the private and public sectors can learn valuable lessons from the secretary's old-fashioned dilemma.
Clinton used a single private account for all of her email communications. By her description, she emailed many people on many occasions about many private and professional topics. To be sure, her communications, covering everything from her daughter's wedding plans to the international affairs of the most powerful nation on earth, presumably were a bit more consequential than those of the average worker. Still, her technology choices were the equivalent, in the private sector, of a chief executive officer using a private account for any and all company-related communications. Few if any corporations would knowingly sanction such a system. Nevertheless, it is not uncommon for employees to mix personal and business communications and newer technologies sometimes make that problem worse.
Although most companies still rely heavily on email, in some places email is being replaced by more “social” workplace communication tools. Yammer, for example, is a growing cloud-based social-networking application designed to facilitate communication and collaboration within an organization. Some describe Yammer as a kind of “internal Facebook.” To the extent that Yammer and similar platforms encourage both personal and business communications within a single application, employers may be inadvertently endorsing the same sort of mingling on employees' personal accounts.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCovington Creates AI Director Role Focused on 'Demystifying' Tech for Lawyers
4 minute readTechnology Made Privilege Logging Unwieldy. Can AI Fix It?
2023 Saw the Most E-Discovery Decisions Since The Pandemic. What Changed?
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250