“If the bureau hasn’t made the petition and ruling public yet, you risk doing that when you file a case in U.S. district court,” Tucker said. “That is the source of significant heartburn.”
The judge’s ruling in Doe v. CFPB is posted below.
In the crosshairs of a secret federal investigation, companies can face a dilemma: challenge the agency and risk public exposure or keep everything confidential as investigators assert their authority. A Washington federal judge's ruling, published this week, kept the identities of the companies and an individual secret—some measure of comfort for businesses and their lawyers who are navigating consumer-protection enforcement by a relatively new agency that doesn't have much guidance yet from the courts.
October 23, 2015 at 07:50 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
“If the bureau hasn’t made the petition and ruling public yet, you risk doing that when you file a case in U.S. district court,” Tucker said. “That is the source of significant heartburn.”
The judge’s ruling in Doe v. CFPB is posted below.
Presented by BigVoodoo
GlobeSt. Women of Influence Conference celebrates the women who drive the commercial real estate industry forward.
The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.
The African Legal Awards recognise exceptional achievement within Africa s legal community during a period of rapid change.
Columbia Law School seeks an experienced lawyer with a background in criminal defense and a strong interest in community lawyering and clini...
WittKieffer is proud to partner with Mom's Meals in the search for their Director of Legal Affairs. Mom's Meals is an investor-owned compan...
Nutley Law firm concentrating in plaintiff's personal injury for plaintiff seeks an Attorney with three or more years of experience in New J...