FCPA Pilot Program Nets 22 Voluntary Disclosures in Past Year: DOJ
The U.S. Department of Justice's pilot program for violators of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act brought in 22 voluntary disclosures in its first year, a significant increase from 13 voluntary disclosures the year before.
May 17, 2017 at 04:41 PM
12 minute read
The U.S. Department of Justice's pilot program for violators of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act is apparently appealing to companies, with 22 voluntary disclosures reported in its first year.
That represents a significant increase from 13 voluntary disclosures the year before. Andrew Weissmann, chief of the DOJ Criminal Division's fraud section, disclosed the numbers last week while speaking at the Practising Law Institute in New York City.
DOJ spokesman Peter Carr confirms the figures but declines to release any more information about the 22 new cases until the FCPA unit finalizes its report on the pilot program.
The DOJ introduced the program in April 2016, saying it would provide prosecutors and corporations a clearer understanding of what it offers a company that voluntarily discloses its wrongdoing, fully cooperates with an investigation, and institutes remedial compliance measures.
The top prize is a letter from the DOJ saying it is declining to prosecute the violation. But a declination letter is not guaranteed.
Steven Tyrrell, managing partner of Weil, Gotshal & Manges' Washington, D.C., office and head of the firm's white-collar defense and investigation's group, said Weissmann's numbers do not surprise him.
“The program offers companies an opportunity to avoid prosecution with declination by DOJ,” Tyrrell said. “And that is a significant incentive for voluntary disclosure. It is especially significant for a public company” that may want to avoid the stigma of a prosecution, he said.
Jason Linder, the new head of the global investigations and anti-corruption practice in the Los Angeles office of Irell & Manella, also was not surprised. But Linder, who spent nearly 10 years as a federal prosecutor including as senior trial attorney in the DOJ's FCPA unit, cautioned that the sample size was too small for strong conclusions.
“That said, the goals of the pilot program are to provide companies with more, and more transparent, incentives to disclose misconduct voluntarily, cooperate fully with government investigations, and remediate misconduct and controls failures uncovered during an investigation,” Linder said.
“These numbers may well indicate that the pilot program is achieving the ends for which it was created.”
The pilot program also may be achieving another end–it fits nicely with the DOJ's announced efforts to speed up FCPA investigations. Trevor McFadden, the DOJ Criminal Division's deputy assistant attorney general, said at a conference in Washington, D.C., last month that prosecutors are committed to wrapping up old FCPA cases and investigating new ones more quickly.
The average FCPA case takes more than four years to resolve, and at least one, Wal-Mart Stores Inc., has been lingering for nearly six years. But various news reports have said a settlement in the Wal-Mart case is imminent, perhaps this week or next.
In the past year the DOJ has publicly declined prosecution in five cases in which companies voluntarily disclosed violations and posted the details online as examples. Weissmann's 22 cases do not include these five, in which disclosures came before the pilot program started.
Weil's Tyrrell, who headed DOJ's fraud section from 2006-2009, represented one of the five companies, Texas-based HMT LLC. The private manufacturer of storage tanks received its declination letter and a nonprosecution letter last Sept. 29.
Tyrrell said he does not automatically advise companies to voluntarily disclose a violation. “It always depends on the specific facts and circumstances of each situation,” he added.
Linder agreed, saying such a decision is “incredibly fact- and situation-specific.”
Copyright The National Law Journal. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
The U.S. Department of Justice's pilot program for violators of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act is apparently appealing to companies, with 22 voluntary disclosures reported in its first year.
That represents a significant increase from 13 voluntary disclosures the year before. Andrew Weissmann, chief of the DOJ Criminal Division's fraud section, disclosed the numbers last week while speaking at the Practising Law Institute in
DOJ spokesman Peter Carr confirms the figures but declines to release any more information about the 22 new cases until the FCPA unit finalizes its report on the pilot program.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump's SEC Overhaul: What It Means for Big Law Capital Markets, Crypto Work
Financial Services Has a Trust Problem. Can GCs Help Right the Ship?
Covington, Steptoe Form New Groups Amid Demand in Regulatory, Enforcement Space
4 minute readDOJ Files Antitrust Suit Against Visa Alleging It Thwarts Payment-Processing Rivals
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250