US Banking Examiner, Sanctioned After Wells Fargo Scandal, Probes His Agency
A senior U.S. national bank inspector punished in the aftermath of the Wells Fargo sham-accounts scandal sued federal banking regulators on Tuesday for information about their investigation of him. The examiner, Bradley Linskens, who joined the U.S. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency in 1993, filed the public-records lawsuit in Washington federal district court.
May 17, 2017 at 10:02 AM
3 minute read
A senior U.S. national bank inspector punished in the aftermath of the Wells Fargo sham-accounts scandal sued federal banking regulators on Tuesday for information about their investigation of him.
The examiner, Bradley Linskens, who joined the U.S. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency in 1993, filed the public-records lawsuit in Washington federal district court. Linskens was named a senior bank examiner last year at the OCC, the central U.S. regulatory agency for national banks.
Linskens was the examiner-in-charge of Wells Fargo, which in September agreed to pay $185 million to resolve state and federal claims that the bank opened as many as 2.1 million potentially unauthorized accounts without customer permission. Part of that deal included a $100 million settlement with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
A lawyer for Linskens, Rani Rolston of Washington's Alan Lescht & Associates, was not immediately reached for comment Wednesday.
Reuters and CNN were among the news outlets that reported in April on the removal of Linskens from his position as a senior national bank examiner at OCC.
Media reports cited unidentified sources who were not permitted to speak publicly about the discipline. Linskens, according to Reuters, oversaw a staff of more than 60 people.
Linskens's lawsuit seeks “records related to communications and documents regarding plaintiff's suspension from his job responsibilities at the OCC.” The suit also demands internal “documents and communications regarding the agency's placement of Mr. Linskens on administrative leave or removal of his responsibilities regarding Wells Fargo.”
The lawsuit, which cites the various media reports, also seeks any communication between OCC and those news outlets.
Thomas Curry, the former OCC head, said in September the agency would conduct a review of its oversight of Wells Fargo.
“The actions the OCC took, together with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, and the L.A. city attorney rightfully hold the bank accountable and require necessary corrective action,” Curry told a Senate committee. “However, I believe the OCC can and must do better. To that end, I have asked my Senior Deputy Comptroller for Enterprise Governance to conduct a post mortem to identify potential gaps in our supervision. I will address any identified gaps.”
In January last year, Curry lauded Linskens when he named him senior national bank examiner. “Brad has certainly earned this honor during his 23-year career at the OCC and has greatly contributed to fulfilling our mission of ensuring the safety, soundness, and fairness of our federal banking system,” Curry said.
Keith Noreika, a Simpson Thacher & Bartlett partner, was named acting comptroller this month. Curry's five-year term ended in April but he was still on board until the Trump administration moved to replace him.
Related Articles:
|- Report Faults Wells Fargo's Law Department in Sham-Accounts Scandal
- Cravath Partner Allen Parker Is Named Wells Fargo GC
- Wells Fargo to Pay Largest Penalty in Consumer Protection Agency's History
- Noreika Named Acting OCC Comptroller, as Curry Steps Down
- With Curry Out as OCC Comptroller, Doubts Persist About Fintech Bank Charter
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllChicago Federal Court Offers Banks Relief From Illinois' Historic Credit Fee Curbs
4 minute readWill Khan Resign? FTC Chair Isn't Saying Whether She'll Stick Around After Giving Up Gavel
$25M Grubhub Settlement Sheds Light on How Other Gig Economy Firms Can Avoid Regulatory Trouble
8 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'Largest Retail Data Breach in History'? Hot Topic and Affiliated Brands Sued for Alleged Failure to Prevent Data Breach Linked to Snowflake Software
- 2Former President of New York State Bar, and the New York Bar Foundation, Dies As He Entered 70th Year as Attorney
- 3Legal Advocates in Uproar Upon Release of Footage Showing CO's Beat Black Inmate Before His Death
- 4Longtime Baker & Hostetler Partner, Former White House Counsel David Rivkin Dies at 68
- 5Court System Seeks Public Comment on E-Filing for Annual Report
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250