How In-House Lawyers Responded to the FTC's 'Influencer' Letters
The National Law Journal obtained several responses from companies that received letters from the FTC this year urging greater disclosures of any paid relationships that involve so-called social media "influencers." The agency and consumer advocacy groups have raised concern that influencer advertising can give the impression of an organic endorsement when, in fact, there is a business relationship behind the product promotion.
May 26, 2017 at 01:56 PM
11 minute read
In a March 20 letter, the Federal Trade Commission put on notice the manufacturer of the popular Muscle Milk line of protein shakes: If a celebrity gets paid for a promotional post on Instagram, that business relationship would need to be disclosed.
The FTC highlighted an Instagram post by Nina Agdal, in which the model poses in the corner of a boxing ring with boxing gloves and two cartons of Muscle Milk at her feet. The caption of the Instagram post: “Spent my morning in the ring with @MuscleMilk @BoxingNapoleon,” followed by emoticons of a trophy and a flexed bicep.
“If your company has a business relationship with Ms. Agdal, that relationship should be clearly and conspicuously disclosed in her endorsements,” wrote Mary Engle, associate director of the FTC's division of advertising practices, framing the letter as a reminder of the agency's disclosure standards.
The National Law Journal obtained several responses from companies that received letters from the FTC this year urging greater disclosures of any paid relationships that involve so-called social media “influencers.” The agency and consumer advocacy groups have raised concern that influencer advertising can give the impression of an organic endorsement when, in fact, there is a business relationship behind the product promotion.
Hormel Foods, the Minnesota-based parent of the Muscle Milk brand, told the FTC that the company had gotten the message, according to a letter the NLJ obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request.
“This incident has raised our awareness regarding ensuring all of our advertising and public relations agencies educate our promotional partners and endorsers on proper disclosures,” Steve Toeniskoetter, a senior in-house attorney for Hormel, wrote to the FTC. “We are in the process of modifying our policies and practices accordingly.
Who Got Social 'Influencer' Letters From the FTC? Read the List.
Hormel was responding on behalf of its subsidiary CytoSport. The company was among others—including Dunkin' Donuts, Chanel, Adidas and Cabela's—that received a letter from the FTC as part of the agency's effort to ensure proper disclosures in so-called “influencer marketing. The agency has cracked down on the growing advertising trend, in which brands pay celebrities and others with large followings to promote products on their social media accounts.
Toeniskoetter did not respond to an interview request. He explained in his letter that the public relations firm Azione PR Inc. had hired Agdal “for the limited purpose” of raising awareness of the launch of the Muscle Milk Coffee House Series line of protein shakes.
“Because of the limited engagement, she was hired through our agency (Azione) instead of directly by CytoSport,” he wrote. “As a result, her contract did not include our standard language regarding ensuring proper disclosures in social media. We are working with Azione and our other outside agencies to ensure all agreements with influencers have requirements on proper disclosures going forward.”
Azione could not be reached for comment Friday.
The FTC in some of the letters gave suggestions for how companies could make clear disclosures of paid endorsements.
For instance, in its letter to FabFitFun, a subscription delivery service that supplies beauty and fitness products, the FTC called attention to Instagram posts by Jenni Farley—the “Jersey Shore” star better known as JWoww—and Jamie Lynn Spears that included the hashtag “#fffpartner.” The FTC took issue with the placement of that hashtag—an apparent attempt at disclosure—at the end of the caption and also questioned if consumers would understand “#fffpartner.”
Chris Lipp, the company's general counsel, embraced the advice, according to a letter obtained through the FOIA request.
“We have considered and appreciate your suggestions to use the hashtag #FabFitPartner and to require our influencers to make this disclosure at or nearer the beginning of their posts, and we will be implementing your recommendations in our influencer agreements and guidelines,” Lipp wrote in a letter to Engle dated April 4. Lipp did not respond to an interview request.
The NLJ requested copies of responses sent to Engle, who wrote not only to companies but also celebrities such as Jennifer Lopez and Nicole Polizzi—the “Jersey Shore” star better known as Snooki—Lindsay Lohan, Heidi Klum, Victoria Beckham and the country music star Luke Bryan. The NLJ's request turned up no records of correspondence from any celebrities or their representatives.
FTC attorney Michael Ostheimer told the NLJ on Friday that the agency learned some of the celebrities were not, in fact, paid to promote a product featured on their Instagram accounts. “Some influencers just posted on their own,” he said.
The records request did reveal emails about a conference call held between FTC officials and in-house lawyers at Johnson & Johnson, which received a letter concerning an Instagram post by the television personality Giuliana Rancic promoting Compeed, a blister treatment. Rosa Son and Paul Jeges, the two in-house counsel whose names and contact information appear in the email records, did not respond to an interview request.
Copyright National Law Journal. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
In a March 20 letter, the Federal Trade Commission put on notice the manufacturer of the popular Muscle Milk line of protein shakes: If a celebrity gets paid for a promotional post on Instagram, that business relationship would need to be disclosed.
The FTC highlighted an Instagram post by Nina Agdal, in which the model poses in the corner of a boxing ring with boxing gloves and two cartons of Muscle Milk at her feet. The caption of the Instagram post: “Spent my morning in the ring with @MuscleMilk @BoxingNapoleon,” followed by emoticons of a trophy and a flexed bicep.
“If your company has a business relationship with Ms. Agdal, that relationship should be clearly and conspicuously disclosed in her endorsements,” wrote Mary Engle, associate director of the FTC's division of advertising practices, framing the letter as a reminder of the agency's disclosure standards.
The National Law Journal obtained several responses from companies that received letters from the FTC this year urging greater disclosures of any paid relationships that involve so-called social media “influencers.” The agency and consumer advocacy groups have raised concern that influencer advertising can give the impression of an organic endorsement when, in fact, there is a business relationship behind the product promotion.
Hormel Foods, the Minnesota-based parent of the Muscle Milk brand, told the FTC that the company had gotten the message, according to a letter the NLJ obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request.
“This incident has raised our awareness regarding ensuring all of our advertising and public relations agencies educate our promotional partners and endorsers on proper disclosures,” Steve Toeniskoetter, a senior in-house attorney for Hormel, wrote to the FTC. “We are in the process of modifying our policies and practices accordingly.
Who Got Social 'Influencer' Letters From the FTC? Read the List.
Hormel was responding on behalf of its subsidiary CytoSport. The company was among others—including Dunkin' Donuts, Chanel, Adidas and Cabela's—that received a letter from the FTC as part of the agency's effort to ensure proper disclosures in so-called “influencer marketing. The agency has cracked down on the growing advertising trend, in which brands pay celebrities and others with large followings to promote products on their social media accounts.
Toeniskoetter did not respond to an interview request. He explained in his letter that the public relations firm Azione PR Inc. had hired Agdal “for the limited purpose” of raising awareness of the launch of the Muscle Milk Coffee House Series line of protein shakes.
“Because of the limited engagement, she was hired through our agency (Azione) instead of directly by CytoSport,” he wrote. “As a result, her contract did not include our standard language regarding ensuring proper disclosures in social media. We are working with Azione and our other outside agencies to ensure all agreements with influencers have requirements on proper disclosures going forward.”
Azione could not be reached for comment Friday.
The FTC in some of the letters gave suggestions for how companies could make clear disclosures of paid endorsements.
For instance, in its letter to FabFitFun, a subscription delivery service that supplies beauty and fitness products, the FTC called attention to Instagram posts by Jenni Farley—the “Jersey Shore” star better known as JWoww—and Jamie Lynn Spears that included the hashtag “#fffpartner.” The FTC took issue with the placement of that hashtag—an apparent attempt at disclosure—at the end of the caption and also questioned if consumers would understand “#fffpartner.”
Chris Lipp, the company's general counsel, embraced the advice, according to a letter obtained through the FOIA request.
“We have considered and appreciate your suggestions to use the hashtag #FabFitPartner and to require our influencers to make this disclosure at or nearer the beginning of their posts, and we will be implementing your recommendations in our influencer agreements and guidelines,” Lipp wrote in a letter to Engle dated April 4. Lipp did not respond to an interview request.
The NLJ requested copies of responses sent to Engle, who wrote not only to companies but also celebrities such as Jennifer Lopez and Nicole Polizzi—the “Jersey Shore” star better known as Snooki—Lindsay Lohan, Heidi Klum, Victoria Beckham and the country music star Luke Bryan. The NLJ's request turned up no records of correspondence from any celebrities or their representatives.
FTC attorney Michael Ostheimer told the NLJ on Friday that the agency learned some of the celebrities were not, in fact, paid to promote a product featured on their Instagram accounts. “Some influencers just posted on their own,” he said.
The records request did reveal emails about a conference call held between FTC officials and in-house lawyers at
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWith Big Law Backing, TikTok Tells DC Circuit Law Forcing Ban or Sale Violates Free Speech
American Bar Association Retracts Israel Statements Following Backlash
Trending Stories
- 1Law Firms Expand Scope of Immigration Expertise, Amid Blitz of Trump Orders
- 2Latest Boutique Combination in Florida Continues Am Law 200 Merger Activity
- 3Sarno da Costa D’Aniello Maceri LLC Announces Addition of New Office in Eatontown, NJ, and Named Partner
- 4Friday Newspaper
- 5Public Notices/Calendars
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250